Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #35,899 of 84,120 nationally

Old Town Florissant Eviction Risk: Moderate

Tract 29189211201 · St. Louis County, MO · pop 5,065 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

For landlords sizing up the Old Town Florissant neighborhood of Florissant, census tract 29189211201 carries an elevated eviction-risk score of 6.3/10. That is riskier than roughly 83% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

50% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 16% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $926 monthly, set against $37,730 in average yearly household income, roughly 29% of income at the averages. About 59% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 30% Stable renters 29% Owners 41%
Tract context
Occupied units2,454
Renter share59.1%
SVI overall0.63
Poverty rate20.4%
Median income$37,730

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 9 tracts In Old Town Florissant
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 15 tracts In Florissant
Very High
Within county
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#37 of 236 tracts In St. Louis County
High
Within state
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#612 of 1,654 tracts In Missouri
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Florissant and the region

Centroid at 38.7869, -90.3406 · click any tract to drill in

Why Old Town Florissant scores 4.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Florissant
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
20.4% poverty · this tract
5.1
Supply constraint
$926 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Florissant
5.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Florissant
7.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Florissant
5.3

How Old Town Florissant compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Old Town Florissant risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.34.3This tracttract 211201Florissant: 2.62.6Florissantparent cityCounty: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 63

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 613Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 9.04%Avg annual filing rate
  • 16.8%Peak (2005)
  • 87Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 291892112012003: 70 filings (9.15/100 renter HHs)2004: 74 filings (9.68/100 renter HHs)2005: 108 filings (16.81/100 renter HHs)2006: 81 filings (12.61/100 renter HHs)2010: 55 filings (4.75/100 renter HHs)2012: 65 filings (4.98/100 renter HHs)2013: 73 filings (5.59/100 renter HHs)2017: 87 filings (8.73/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 24% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 726Total filings 2020-21
  • 9.4Avg monthly (observed)
  • 5.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.85×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 10 filings (2.86× baseline)2020-02-01: 27 filings (7.71× baseline)2020-03-01: 5 filings (0.83× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2020-06-01: 5 filings (0.63× baseline)2020-07-01: 4 filings (0.73× baseline)2020-08-01: 7 filings (1.40× baseline)2020-09-01: 26 filings (5.20× baseline)2020-10-01: 10 filings (1.67× baseline)2020-11-01: 11 filings (1.57× baseline)2020-12-01: 9 filings (2.25× baseline)2021-01-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2021-02-01: 24 filings (6.86× baseline)2021-03-01: 13 filings (2.17× baseline)2021-04-01: 8 filings (0.84× baseline)2021-05-01: 7 filings (2.80× baseline)2021-06-01: 12 filings (1.50× baseline)2021-07-01: 7 filings (1.27× baseline)2021-08-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-09-01: 9 filings (1.80× baseline)2021-10-01: 6 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (0.14× baseline)2021-12-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2022-02-01: 5 filings (1.43× baseline)2022-03-01: 12 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 7 filings (0.74× baseline)2022-05-01: 7 filings (2.80× baseline)2022-06-01: 7 filings (0.88× baseline)2022-07-01: 9 filings (1.64× baseline)2022-08-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-11-01: 5 filings (0.71× baseline)2022-12-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-01-01: 11 filings (3.14× baseline)2023-02-01: 11 filings (3.14× baseline)2023-03-01: 22 filings (3.67× baseline)2023-04-01: 8 filings (0.84× baseline)2023-05-01: 7 filings (2.80× baseline)2023-06-01: 9 filings (1.13× baseline)2023-07-01: 27 filings (4.91× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2023-09-01: 10 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 12 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 7 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-01-01: 16 filings (4.57× baseline)2024-02-01: 9 filings (2.57× baseline)2024-03-01: 11 filings (1.83× baseline)2024-04-01: 8 filings (0.84× baseline)2024-05-01: 11 filings (4.40× baseline)2024-06-01: 11 filings (1.38× baseline)2024-07-01: 14 filings (2.55× baseline)2024-08-01: 9 filings (1.80× baseline)2024-09-01: 7 filings (1.40× baseline)2024-10-01: 10 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-11-01: 7 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 4 filings (1.14× baseline)2025-02-01: 5 filings (1.43× baseline)2025-03-01: 9 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-04-01: 10 filings (1.05× baseline)2025-05-01: 3 filings (1.20× baseline)2025-06-01: 8 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 21 filings (3.82× baseline)2025-08-01: 11 filings (2.20× baseline)2025-09-01: 19 filings (3.80× baseline)2025-10-01: 21 filings (3.50× baseline)2025-11-01: 13 filings (1.86× baseline)2025-12-01: 9 filings (2.25× baseline)2026-01-01: 17 filings (170.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Southwest Oregon, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Old Town Florissant. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Old Town Florissant

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 7.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Florissant eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the St. Louis County average of 5.6 and above the Missouri statewide average of 4.8. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 20.3% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 15.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is Black and White and ranks around the 63rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 29189211201

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29189211201?

Census tract 29189211201 in the Old Town Florissant neighborhood scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 29189211201?

Median gross rent is $926/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 29189211201?

20.4% of residents in tract 29189211201 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,065.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 29189211201?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 63th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 29th, minority 69th, housing 22th.
Q5

Is tract 29189211201 considered part of Old Town Florissant?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 29189211201 fall within Old Town Florissant (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 29189211201?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 613 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 29189211201 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 9.04% of renter households, peaking at 16.8% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 29189211201 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.85× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Southwest Oregon eviction laws, OR), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 29189211201 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 29189211201 compare to Florissant overall?

Tract 29189211201 scores 4.3/10, higher than the parent city of Florissant at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Florissant eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Florissant

Top eight tracts in Florissant ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related