Wydown Skinker Eviction Risk: Lower , Clayton
Tract 29189216402 · St. Louis County, MO · pop 2,874 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
With a score of 3/10, tract 29189216402 in the Wydown Skinker area of Clayton, MO reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 2,874. The voucher gap is 41.6%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Clayton and the region
Centroid at 38.6402, -90.3242 · click any tract to drill in
Why Wydown Skinker scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Wydown Skinker compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 7
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 6%Socioeconomic
- 28%Household composition
- 54%Racial/ethnic minority
- 6%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 98%Grade A
- 2%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 22Total filings 2020-21
- 0.3Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.4Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.67×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Southwest Oregon, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Wydown Skinker. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.7%Housing insecurity
- 4.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.0%Food insecurity
- 3.0%SNAP enrollment
- 4.1%Transit barriers
- 3.7%No health insurance
- 12.9%Frequent mental distress
- 21.9%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Wydown Skinker
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 9.2/10. Against St. Louis County at 42.0%, 29% of renters here are cost-burdened. The severe-burden share is 25%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.7/10. Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.5/10. It sits 1.0 points below the St. Louis County average of 4.0.
Housing insecurity runs 5.7% against 14.2% nationally. Adults with no health insurance runs 3.7% against 11.3% nationally.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground A ("Best"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Against average income of $130,991, annual rent is just 16%. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Average gross rent is $1,720, close to the Clayton average.
50% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 29189216402
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29189216402?
What is the average rent in tract 29189216402?
What is the poverty rate in tract 29189216402?
How socially vulnerable is tract 29189216402?
Is tract 29189216402 considered part of Wydown Skinker?
Did eviction filings in tract 29189216402 drop during COVID?
What share of households in tract 29189216402 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 29189216402 compare to Clayton overall?
Was tract 29189216402 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Clayton
Top eight tracts in Clayton ranked by composite eviction-risk score.