Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #72,539 of 84,120 nationally

Hi-Pointe Eviction Risk: Lower , Richmond Heights

Tract 29189216700 · St. Louis County, MO · pop 3,670 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Census tract 29189216700 covers Hi-Pointe in Richmond Heights, home to 3,670 residents. For landlords it grades 5.7/10, a moderate reading. That is riskier than roughly 64% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 47% of renter households, a severe level, and 16% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,494 a month against an average household income of $84,223 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 51% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
2.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 24% Stable renters 27% Owners 49%
Tract context
Occupied units1,871
Renter share51.5%
SVI overall0.06
Poverty rate3.1%
Median income$84,223

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Hi-Pointe
Moderate
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Richmond Heights
Moderate
Within county
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#150 of 236 tracts In St. Louis County
Low
Within state
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#1,412 of 1,654 tracts In Missouri
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Richmond Heights and the region

Centroid at 38.6298, -90.3276 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hi-Pointe scores 2.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Richmond Heights
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
3.1% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,494 rent vs county FMR
7.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Richmond Heights
3.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Richmond Heights
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Richmond Heights
3.3

How Hi-Pointe compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Hi-Pointe risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.12.1This tracttract 216700Richmond Heights: 2.22.2Richmond Heightsparent cityCounty: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 6

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 106Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 1.62%Avg annual filing rate
  • 2.3%Peak (2006)
  • 1Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 291892167002003: 12 filings (1.54/100 renter HHs)2004: 11 filings (1.41/100 renter HHs)2005: 15 filings (1.79/100 renter HHs)2006: 19 filings (2.26/100 renter HHs)2010: 18 filings (2.17/100 renter HHs)2012: 19 filings (2.32/100 renter HHs)2013: 11 filings (1.34/100 renter HHs)2017: 1 filings (0.12/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 92% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 49Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.6Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.53×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2020-02-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 5 filings (5.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 4 filings (8.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Southwest Oregon, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hi-Pointe

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Richmond Heights, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the St. Louis County average of 5.6 and above the Missouri statewide average of 4.8. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.53x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

In CDC survey modeling, about 7.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 29189216700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29189216700?

Census tract 29189216700 in the Hi-Pointe neighborhood scores 2.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 29189216700?

Median gross rent is $1,494/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 29189216700?

3.1% of residents in tract 29189216700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,670.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 29189216700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 6th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 2th, minority 27th, housing 33th.
Q5

Is tract 29189216700 considered part of Hi-Pointe?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 29189216700 fall within Hi-Pointe (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 29189216700?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 106 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 29189216700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 1.62% of renter households, peaking at 2.3% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 29189216700 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.53× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Southwest Oregon eviction laws, OR), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 29189216700 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 29189216700 compare to Richmond Heights overall?

Tract 29189216700 scores 2.1/10, right in line with the parent city of Richmond Heights at 2.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Richmond Heights; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 29189216700 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 12% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Richmond Heights

Top eight tracts in Richmond Heights ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related