Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #51,553 of 84,120 nationally

Lindenwood Park Eviction Risk: Lower , St. Louis

Tract 29510103800 · St. Louis city, MO · pop 3,769 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

Tract 29510103800, home to 3,769 residents in the Lindenwood Park neighborhood of St. Louis, scores 4.5/10 for landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than roughly 23% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

About 10% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a modest level, and 3% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $974 monthly, set against $77,956 in average yearly household income, roughly 15% of income at the averages. About 23% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 20% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,905
Renter share22.6%
SVI overall0.14
Poverty rate6.4%
Median income$77,956

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Lindenwood Park
Moderate
Within parent city
9 th percentile
Rank, 9th percentileLowHigh
#95 of 104 tracts In St. Louis
Very Low
Within county
8 th percentile
Rank, 8th percentileLowHigh
#96 of 104 tracts In St. Louis city
Very Low
Within state
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#965 of 1,654 tracts In Missouri
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across St. Louis and the region

Centroid at 38.5978, -90.3091 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lindenwood Park scores 3.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from St. Louis
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.3
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
6.4% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$974 rent vs county FMR
3.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from St. Louis
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from St. Louis
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from St. Louis
5.0

How Lindenwood Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lindenwood Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.43.4This tracttract 103800St. Louis: 3.33.3St. Louisparent cityCounty: 4.84.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 14

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 132Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 2.45%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.7%Peak (2012)
  • 10Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 295101038002004: 3 filings (0.88/100 renter HHs)2005: 11 filings (2.33/100 renter HHs)2006: 10 filings (2.11/100 renter HHs)2007: 7 filings (1.48/100 renter HHs)2008: 8 filings (1.69/100 renter HHs)2009: 15 filings (3.17/100 renter HHs)2010: 11 filings (3.14/100 renter HHs)2011: 12 filings (2.99/100 renter HHs)2012: 19 filings (4.73/100 renter HHs)2013: 4 filings (1.00/100 renter HHs)2015: 11 filings (2.74/100 renter HHs)2016: 11 filings (2.93/100 renter HHs)2017: 10 filings (2.66/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 233% over the past 13 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 41Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.62×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 3 filings (12.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (4.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-10-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (1.33× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-05-01: 1 filings (0.57× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (1.60× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 3 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 2 filings (8.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (2.67× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.80× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Southwest Oregon, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lindenwood Park

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 5.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from St. Louis eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the St. Louis City County average of 5.8 and in line with the Missouri statewide average of 4.8. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of B ("Still Desirable"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 132 eviction filings here over 13 tracked years, with about 2.5% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 4.7% of renter households in 2012.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 29510103800

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29510103800?

Census tract 29510103800 in the Lindenwood Park neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 29510103800?

Median gross rent is $974/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 10% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 29510103800?

6.4% of residents in tract 29510103800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,769.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 29510103800?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 14th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 16th, household 15th, minority 18th, housing 34th.
Q5

Is tract 29510103800 considered part of Lindenwood Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 29510103800 fall within Lindenwood Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 29510103800?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 132 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 29510103800 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.45% of renter households, peaking at 4.7% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 29510103800 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.62× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Southwest Oregon eviction laws, OR), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 29510103800 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 29510103800 compare to St. Louis overall?

Tract 29510103800 scores 3.4/10, right in line with the parent city of St. Louis at 3.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from St. Louis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 29510103800 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in St. Louis

Top eight tracts in St. Louis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related