Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #35,899 of 84,120 nationally

Mount Pleasant Eviction Risk: Moderate , St. Louis

Tract 29510115500 · St. Louis city, MO · pop 6,370 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Census tract 29510115500 belongs to the Mount Pleasant neighborhood of St. Louis, Missouri. It is home to 6,370 residents and scores 5.8/10, a moderate reading for landlords. It lands near the 68th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 53% of renter households, a severe level, and 26% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $858 monthly, set against $48,094 in average yearly household income, roughly 21% of income at the averages. Renters make up 60% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.3
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32% Stable renters 28% Owners 40%
Tract context
Occupied units2,484
Renter share60.4%
SVI overall0.91
Poverty rate11.1%
Median income$48,094

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Mount Pleasant
Very Low
Within parent city
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#74 of 104 tracts In St. Louis
Low
Within county
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#74 of 104 tracts In St. Louis city
Low
Within state
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#612 of 1,654 tracts In Missouri
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across St. Louis and the region

Centroid at 38.5723, -90.2461 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mount Pleasant scores 4.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from St. Louis
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.3
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
11.1% poverty · this tract
2.8
Supply constraint
$858 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from St. Louis
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from St. Louis
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from St. Louis
5.0

How Mount Pleasant compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Mount Pleasant risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.34.3This tracttract 115500St. Louis: 3.33.3St. Louisparent cityCounty: 4.84.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 91

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2,012Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 12.33%Avg annual filing rate
  • 12.2%Peak (2012)
  • 148Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 295101155002004: 159 filings (11.75/100 renter HHs)2005: 146 filings (14.53/100 renter HHs)2006: 168 filings (16.72/100 renter HHs)2007: 175 filings (17.41/100 renter HHs)2008: 164 filings (16.32/100 renter HHs)2009: 122 filings (12.14/100 renter HHs)2010: 159 filings (12.58/100 renter HHs)2011: 146 filings (9.79/100 renter HHs)2012: 182 filings (12.21/100 renter HHs)2013: 143 filings (9.59/100 renter HHs)2015: 167 filings (11.20/100 renter HHs)2016: 133 filings (7.58/100 renter HHs)2017: 148 filings (8.44/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 13 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 753Total filings 2020-21
  • 9.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 12.2Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.80×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 11 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 19 filings (1.69× baseline)2020-03-01: 8 filings (1.07× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 2 filings (0.13× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.06× baseline)2020-07-01: 6 filings (0.41× baseline)2020-08-01: 10 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-09-01: 11 filings (0.66× baseline)2020-10-01: 13 filings (0.88× baseline)2020-11-01: 11 filings (0.96× baseline)2020-12-01: 10 filings (0.89× baseline)2021-01-01: 4 filings (0.36× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (0.09× baseline)2021-03-01: 9 filings (1.20× baseline)2021-04-01: 7 filings (0.58× baseline)2021-05-01: 6 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-06-01: 9 filings (0.58× baseline)2021-07-01: 9 filings (0.62× baseline)2021-08-01: 11 filings (0.73× baseline)2021-09-01: 9 filings (0.54× baseline)2021-10-01: 7 filings (0.47× baseline)2021-11-01: 9 filings (0.78× baseline)2021-12-01: 7 filings (0.62× baseline)2022-01-01: 11 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 12 filings (1.07× baseline)2022-03-01: 5 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-04-01: 8 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-05-01: 12 filings (0.80× baseline)2022-06-01: 10 filings (0.65× baseline)2022-07-01: 15 filings (1.03× baseline)2022-08-01: 11 filings (0.73× baseline)2022-09-01: 10 filings (0.60× baseline)2022-10-01: 16 filings (1.08× baseline)2022-11-01: 9 filings (0.78× baseline)2022-12-01: 8 filings (0.71× baseline)2023-01-01: 20 filings (1.82× baseline)2023-02-01: 11 filings (0.98× baseline)2023-03-01: 15 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 18 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-05-01: 8 filings (0.53× baseline)2023-06-01: 8 filings (0.52× baseline)2023-07-01: 14 filings (0.97× baseline)2023-08-01: 20 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-09-01: 10 filings (0.60× baseline)2023-10-01: 11 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-11-01: 15 filings (1.30× baseline)2023-12-01: 11 filings (0.98× baseline)2024-01-01: 10 filings (0.91× baseline)2024-02-01: 9 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-03-01: 6 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-04-01: 6 filings (0.50× baseline)2024-05-01: 12 filings (0.80× baseline)2024-06-01: 4 filings (0.26× baseline)2024-07-01: 5 filings (0.34× baseline)2024-08-01: 9 filings (0.60× baseline)2024-09-01: 18 filings (1.07× baseline)2024-10-01: 14 filings (0.95× baseline)2024-11-01: 17 filings (1.48× baseline)2024-12-01: 6 filings (0.53× baseline)2025-01-01: 16 filings (1.45× baseline)2025-02-01: 7 filings (0.62× baseline)2025-03-01: 11 filings (1.47× baseline)2025-04-01: 14 filings (1.17× baseline)2025-05-01: 7 filings (0.47× baseline)2025-06-01: 12 filings (0.77× baseline)2025-07-01: 14 filings (0.97× baseline)2025-08-01: 7 filings (0.47× baseline)2025-09-01: 9 filings (0.54× baseline)2025-10-01: 12 filings (0.81× baseline)2025-11-01: 8 filings (0.70× baseline)2025-12-01: 7 filings (0.62× baseline)2026-01-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Southwest Oregon, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Mount Pleasant. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mount Pleasant

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 5.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from St. Louis eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the St. Louis City County average of 5.8 and above the Missouri statewide average of 4.8. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 91st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

In CDC survey modeling, about 26.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 21.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 29510115500

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29510115500?

Census tract 29510115500 in the Mount Pleasant neighborhood scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 29510115500?

Median gross rent is $858/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 53% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 29510115500?

11.1% of residents in tract 29510115500 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,370.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 29510115500?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 91th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 91th, household 69th, minority 81th, housing 86th.
Q5

Is tract 29510115500 considered part of Mount Pleasant?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 29510115500 fall within Mount Pleasant (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 29510115500?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2,012 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 29510115500 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 12.33% of renter households, peaking at 12.2% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 29510115500 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.80× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Southwest Oregon eviction laws, OR), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 29510115500 struggle to pay rent?

About 26.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 21.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 29510115500 compare to St. Louis overall?

Tract 29510115500 scores 4.3/10, higher than the parent city of St. Louis at 3.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from St. Louis eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q10

Was tract 29510115500 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 21% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in St. Louis

Top eight tracts in St. Louis ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related