Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #31,049 of 84,120 nationally

Aksarben Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Omaha

Tract 31055007001 · Douglas County, NE · pop 5,283 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Tract 31055007001 sits in the Aksarben Village area of Omaha eviction risk, NE, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.1/10. It is home to 5,283 residents. The severe-burden share is 28%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 39% Stable renters 44% Owners 17%
Tract context
Occupied units2,536
Renter share82.1%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate18.3%
Median income$53,045

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Aksarben Village
Moderate
Within parent city
85 th percentile
Rank, 85th percentileLowHigh
#25 of 157 tracts In Omaha
High
Within county
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#33 of 163 tracts In Douglas County
High
Within state
99 th percentile
Rank, 99th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 553 tracts In Nebraska
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Omaha and the region

Centroid at 41.2297, -96.0124 · click any tract to drill in

Why Aksarben Village scores 5.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Omaha
4.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.6
State political climate
Nebraska legislature & governorship
1.8
Economic stress
18.3% poverty · this tract
4.6
Supply constraint
$1,251 rent vs county FMR
4.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Omaha
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Omaha
3.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Omaha
3.0

How Aksarben Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Aksarben Village risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.1This tracttract 0070013.7Omahaparent city3.9Countyavg tract in county3.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 86

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 634Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 3.91%Avg annual filing rate
  • 5.3%Peak (2004)
  • 44Filings in 2014 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2014
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 31055007001
Filings dropped 21% over the past 13 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Aksarben Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Aksarben Village

The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. 82% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.8/10.

It sits 1.2 points above the Douglas County average of 3.9. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 7.5/10. The poverty rate is 18%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest.

The filing record is not thin: 634 evictions over 13 years of observation. Filings peaked in 2004 at 5.3% of renter households. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

In a typical year about 3.9% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 63% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.7/10.

Statewide the NE average is 3.7, so this tract runs 1.4 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 31055007001

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 31055007001?

Census tract 31055007001 in the Aksarben Village neighborhood scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 31055007001?

Median gross rent is $1,251/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 31055007001?

18.3% of residents in tract 31055007001 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,283.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 31055007001?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 73th, household 54th, minority 53th, housing 99th.
Q5

Is tract 31055007001 considered part of Aksarben Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 31055007001 fall within Aksarben Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 31055007001?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 634 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 31055007001 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.91% of renter households, peaking at 5.3% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 31055007001 struggle to pay rent?

About 11.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 31055007001 compare to Omaha overall?

Tract 31055007001 scores 5.1/10, higher than the parent city of Omaha at 3.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Omaha eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 31055007001 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Omaha

Top eight tracts in Omaha ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related