Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #63,308 of 84,120 nationally

Southern Highlands Eviction Risk: Lower , Enterprise

Tract 32003005837 · Clark, NV · pop 4,500 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi

Census tract 32003005837 covers part of the Southern Highlands area of Enterprise, NV, and scores 3.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,500. Cost burden runs 24% here against 50.7% across Clark County.

Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 16% Owners 79%
Tract context
Occupied units1,774
Renter share20.6%
SVI overall0.21
Poverty rate3.9%
Median income$114,167

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 6 tracts In Southern Highlands
Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#41 of 41 tracts In Enterprise
Very Low
Within county
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#406 of 535 tracts In Clark
Low
Within state
28 th percentile
Rank, 28th percentileLowHigh
#562 of 779 tracts In Nevada
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Enterprise and the region

Centroid at 35.9931, -115.1972 · click any tract to drill in

Why Southern Highlands scores 3.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Enterprise
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Nevada legislature & governorship
3.7
Economic stress
3.9% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,276 rent vs county FMR
8.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Enterprise
7.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Enterprise
7.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Enterprise
6.0

How Southern Highlands compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Southern Highlands risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.2This tracttract 0058374.6Enterpriseparent city4.7Countyavg tract in county4.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 21

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 179Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.21×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Las Vegas, NV as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Southern Highlands. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Southern Highlands

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.9/10.

The voucher gap is 30.1%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. It sits 1.5 points below the Clark County average of 4.7. On the high side, supply constraint reads 8/10.

Severe burden reaches 13%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Average gross rent is $2,276, 18% above the Enterprise average. SNAP participation runs 8.1% against 15.2% nationally.

Food insecurity runs 10.8% against 17.8% nationally. On the national scale it lands near the 25th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Only 21% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Statewide the NV average is 4.5, so this tract runs 1.3 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 32003005837

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 32003005837?

Census tract 32003005837 in the Southern Highlands neighborhood scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 32003005837?

Median gross rent is $2,276/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 24% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 32003005837?

3.9% of residents in tract 32003005837 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,500.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 32003005837?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 21th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 47th, household 29th, minority 61th, housing 4th.
Q5

Is tract 32003005837 considered part of Southern Highlands?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 32003005837 fall within Southern Highlands (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 32003005837 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.21× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Las Vegas eviction risk, NV), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 32003005837 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 32003005837 compare to Enterprise overall?

Tract 32003005837 scores 3.2/10, lower than the parent city of Enterprise at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Enterprise eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Enterprise

Top eight tracts in Enterprise ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related