White Horse Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Absecon
Tract 34001010200 · Atlantic County, NJ · pop 6,548 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
With a score of 5.9/10, tract 34001010200 in the White Horse Village area of Absecon, NJ reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 6,548 residents. Severe burden reaches 43%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Absecon and the region
Centroid at 39.4167, -74.4876 · click any tract to drill in
Why White Horse Village scores 5.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow White Horse Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 56
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 55%Socioeconomic
- 56%Household composition
- 32%Racial/ethnic minority
- 59%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 18%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 121Total filings over 6 yrs
- 8.27%Avg annual filing rate
- 11.6%Peak (2015)
- 20Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within White Horse Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.3%Housing insecurity
- 5.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.2%Food insecurity
- 6.1%SNAP enrollment
- 6.1%Transit barriers
- 7.8%No health insurance
- 15.3%Frequent mental distress
- 25.7%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in White Horse Village
80% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well clear of the Atlantic County average of 48.9%. The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 9.4/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 9.3/10.
Set annual rent against average income of $72,060 and the ratio lands at 32%, above the conventional 30% ceiling. On the softer side, economic stress reads 2.3/10. SNAP participation runs 6.1% against 15.2% nationally.
Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 121 filings here across 6 tracked years. Food insecurity runs 10.2% against 17.8% nationally. The voucher gap is 13.1%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
Filings peaked in 2015 at 11.6% of renter households. This ground was mapped B ("Still Desirable") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Atlantic City. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.
In a typical year about 8.3% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 77% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6/10.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 34001010200
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34001010200?
What is the average rent in tract 34001010200?
What is the poverty rate in tract 34001010200?
How socially vulnerable is tract 34001010200?
Is tract 34001010200 considered part of White Horse Village?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34001010200?
What share of households in tract 34001010200 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 34001010200 compare to Absecon overall?
Was tract 34001010200 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Absecon
Top eight tracts in Absecon ranked by composite eviction-risk score.