Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #44,543 of 84,120 nationally

White Horse Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Absecon

Tract 34001010300 · Atlantic County, NJ · pop 2,538 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Census tract 34001010300 belongs to White Horse Village in Absecon, New Jersey. It is home to 2,538 residents and scores 6.9/10, an elevated reading for landlords. That is riskier than roughly 93% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

44% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 36% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,531 monthly, set against $84,063 in average yearly household income, roughly 22% of income at the averages. Renters make up 30% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 17% Owners 70%
Tract context
Occupied units982
Renter share30.0%
SVI overall0.82
Poverty rate7.1%
Median income$84,063

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In White Horse Village
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Absecon
Very Low
Within county
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#46 of 73 tracts In Atlantic County
Low
Within state
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#1,031 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Absecon and the region

Centroid at 39.4176, -74.5079 · click any tract to drill in

Why White Horse Village scores 3.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Absecon
5.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.3
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
7.1% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,531 rent vs county FMR
3.9
Rent control risk
Inherited from Absecon
9.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Absecon
5.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Absecon
7.1

How White Horse Village compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
White Horse Village risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.83.8This tracttract 010300Absecon: 7.47.4Abseconparent cityCounty: 5.05.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.34.3Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 82

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 213Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 11.35%Avg annual filing rate
  • 13.6%Peak (2017)
  • 35Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2013 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 340010103002013: 36 filings (11.39/100 renter HHs)2014: 36 filings (11.39/100 renter HHs)2015: 31 filings (9.81/100 renter HHs)2016: 33 filings (10.65/100 renter HHs)2017: 42 filings (13.55/100 renter HHs)2018: 35 filings (11.29/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within White Horse Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in White Horse Village

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 9.4/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Absecon, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Atlantic County average of 6.7 and above the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 213 eviction filings here over 6 tracked years, with about 11.3% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 13.6% of renter households in 2017.

The tract is White and Hispanic or Latino and ranks around the 82nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 34001010300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34001010300?

Census tract 34001010300 in the White Horse Village neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34001010300?

Median gross rent is $1,531/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34001010300?

7.1% of residents in tract 34001010300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,538.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34001010300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 82th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 76th, household 92th, minority 73th, housing 61th.
Q5

Is tract 34001010300 considered part of White Horse Village?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34001010300 fall within White Horse Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34001010300?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 213 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34001010300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 11.35% of renter households, peaking at 13.6% in 2017. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 34001010300 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 34001010300 compare to Absecon overall?

Tract 34001010300 scores 3.8/10, lower than the parent city of Absecon at 7.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Absecon; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 34001010300 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Absecon

Top eight tracts in Absecon ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related