White Horse Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Absecon
Tract 34001010300 · Atlantic County, NJ · pop 2,538 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Tract 34001010300 sits in the White Horse Village area of Absecon, NJ, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.4/10. Population here is 2,538. Severe burden reaches 36%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Absecon and the region
Centroid at 39.4176, -74.5079 · click any tract to drill in
Why White Horse Village scores 5.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow White Horse Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 82
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 76%Socioeconomic
- 92%Household composition
- 73%Racial/ethnic minority
- 61%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 22%Grade B
- 1%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 213Total filings over 6 yrs
- 11.35%Avg annual filing rate
- 13.6%Peak (2017)
- 35Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within White Horse Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 13.9%Housing insecurity
- 8.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 17.1%Food insecurity
- 10.8%SNAP enrollment
- 8.7%Transit barriers
- 10.8%No health insurance
- 14.9%Frequent mental distress
- 27.4%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in White Horse Village
The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 9.4/10. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 9.3/10.
On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.8/10. 44% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Atlantic County average of 48.9%. Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 213 filings here across 6 tracked years.
Average gross rent is $1,531, 15% below the Absecon average. Filings peaked in 2017 at 13.6% of renter households.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 11.3% of renter households face a filing. On the national scale it lands near the 70th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 8.4/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the household composition measure is the most pressured.
It tracks the Atlantic County average of 5.5 closely. Annual rent works out to 22% of average household income of $84,063. 30% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 34001010300
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34001010300?
What is the average rent in tract 34001010300?
What is the poverty rate in tract 34001010300?
How socially vulnerable is tract 34001010300?
Is tract 34001010300 considered part of White Horse Village?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34001010300?
What share of households in tract 34001010300 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 34001010300 compare to Absecon overall?
Was tract 34001010300 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Absecon
Top eight tracts in Absecon ranked by composite eviction-risk score.