Knickerbocker Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Bergenfield
Tract 34003055201 · Bergen County, NJ · pop 4,067 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi
Tract 34003055201 sits in the Knickerbocker Park area of Tenafly, NJ, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5.6/10. It is home to 4,067 residents. 17% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well under the Bergen County average of 46.6%.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Bergenfield and the region
Centroid at 40.9186, -73.9745 · click any tract to drill in
Why Knickerbocker Park scores 5.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Knickerbocker Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 21
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 2%Socioeconomic
- 82%Household composition
- 62%Racial/ethnic minority
- 22%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 69%Grade B
- 15%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Knickerbocker Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.3%Housing insecurity
- 3.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.4%Food insecurity
- 2.3%SNAP enrollment
- 3.4%Transit barriers
- 4.5%No health insurance
- 11.0%Frequent mental distress
- 15.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Knickerbocker Park
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 10/10. The voucher gap is 69.0%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10. The severe-burden share is 17%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
SNAP participation runs 2.3% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 5.4% against 17.8% nationally.
Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 7.9/10. It sits 0.7 points below the Bergen County average of 6.3.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. On the national scale it lands near the 73rd percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 15% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
Social vulnerability reads 2.9/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
About tract 34003055201
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34003055201?
What is the average rent in tract 34003055201?
What is the poverty rate in tract 34003055201?
How socially vulnerable is tract 34003055201?
Is tract 34003055201 considered part of Knickerbocker Park?
What share of households in tract 34003055201 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 34003055201 compare to Bergenfield overall?
Was tract 34003055201 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Bergenfield
Top eight tracts in Bergenfield ranked by composite eviction-risk score.