Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #29,336 of 84,120 nationally

Mill Pond Eviction Risk: Moderate , Franklin Lakes

Tract 34003061200 · Bergen County, NJ · pop 3,308 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

34003061200 is a census tract in the Mill Pond area of Bergen County, NJ. It scores 5.2/10 for landlords. Population here is 3,308. Severe burden reaches 35%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
5.2
Moderate
Confidence 80% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 7% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,114
Renter share11.0%
SVI overall0.08
Poverty rate0.3%
Median income$206,667

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Mill Pond
Very High
Within county
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#160 of 203 tracts In Bergen County
Low
Within state
41 th percentile
Rank, 41st percentileLowHigh
#1,286 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Moderate
National
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#29,336 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Franklin Lakes and the region

Centroid at 41.0058, -74.1764 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mill Pond scores 5.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Franklin Lakes
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
0.3% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,786 rent vs county FMR
3.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Franklin Lakes
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Franklin Lakes
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Franklin Lakes
5.0

How Mill Pond compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Mill Pond risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.2This tracttract 0612005.9Franklin Lakesparent city6.3Countyavg tract in county6.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 8

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 14Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 2.49%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.1%Peak (2018)
  • 5Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2013 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 34003061200
Filings climbed 67% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Mill Pond. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mill Pond

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 1/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 7.9/10. Disability prevalence runs 18.7% against 31.5% nationally.

Food insecurity runs 5.9% against 17.8% nationally. Against Bergen County at 46.6%, 40% of renters here are cost-burdened. It sits 1.1 points below the Bergen County average of 6.3.

The filing record is not thin: 14 evictions over 4 years of observation. Filings peaked in 2018 at 4.1% of renter households. In a typical year about 2.5% of renter households face a filing.

Nationally it ranks #29,336 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 11% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.8/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Rent consumes only 10% of average household income of $206,667, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

Poverty sits at 0%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 34003061200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34003061200?

Census tract 34003061200 in the Mill Pond neighborhood scores 5.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34003061200?

Median gross rent is $1,786/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34003061200?

0.3% of residents in tract 34003061200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,308.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34003061200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 8th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 18th, household 50th, minority 27th, housing 2th.
Q5

Is tract 34003061200 considered part of Mill Pond?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34003061200 fall within Mill Pond (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34003061200?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 14 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 34003061200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.49% of renter households, peaking at 4.1% in 2018. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 34003061200 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 34003061200 compare to Franklin Lakes overall?

Tract 34003061200 scores 5.2/10, lower than the parent city of Franklin Lakes at 5.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Franklin Lakes; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related