Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #56,048 of 84,120 nationally

Villages at Hamilton Eviction Risk: Lower , White Horse

Tract 34021003004 · Mercer County, NJ · pop 5,527 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Census tract 34021003004 covers part of the Villages at Hamilton area of White Horse, NJ, and scores 3.6/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 5,527. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.3/10.

Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 6% Owners 87%
Tract context
Occupied units2,363
Renter share12.3%
SVI overall0.13
Poverty rate2.6%
Median income$100,288

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Villages at Hamilton
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In White Horse
Very Low
Within county
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#72 of 84 tracts In Mercer County
Very Low
Within state
11 th percentile
Rank, 11th percentileLowHigh
#1,945 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across White Horse and the region

Centroid at 40.1966, -74.6874 · click any tract to drill in

Why Villages at Hamilton scores 3.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from White Horse
7.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.0
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,672 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from White Horse
6.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from White Horse
3.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from White Horse
4.7

How Villages at Hamilton compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Villages at Hamilton risk score vs. parent city / county / state3.6This tracttract 0030044.5White Horseparent city5.7Countyavg tract in county6.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 13

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 60Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 2.28%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.3%Peak (2016)
  • 3Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2013 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 34021003004
Filings dropped 79% over the past 6 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Villages at Hamilton. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Villages at Hamilton

The severe-burden share is 29%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10. It sits 2.1 points below the Mercer County average of 5.7.

Against Mercer County at 46.5%, 55% of renters here are cost-burdened. SNAP participation runs 5.0% against 15.2% nationally.

Average gross rent is $1,672, 18% below the White Horse average. Running hot, local political climate reads 7.3/10.

Food insecurity runs 9.3% against 17.8% nationally. Court records carry 60 eviction filings across 6 observed years. The worst year on record was 2016, when 3.3% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 2.3% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 33% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Only 12% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 2.1/10.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 34021003004

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34021003004?

Census tract 34021003004 in the Villages at Hamilton neighborhood scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34021003004?

Median gross rent is $1,672/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 55% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34021003004?

2.6% of residents in tract 34021003004 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,527.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34021003004?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 13th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 7th, household 62th, minority 27th, housing 13th.
Q5

Is tract 34021003004 considered part of Villages at Hamilton?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34021003004 fall within Villages at Hamilton (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34021003004?

Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 60 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 34021003004 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.28% of renter households, peaking at 3.3% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 34021003004 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 34021003004 compare to White Horse overall?

Tract 34021003004 scores 3.6/10, lower than the parent city of White Horse at 4.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from White Horse; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in White Horse

Top eight tracts in White Horse ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related