Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #8,653 of 84,120 nationally

Red Bank Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 34025803601 · Monmouth County, NJ · pop 2,079

With a score of 7.9/10, tract 34025803601 in Red Bank, NJ reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.1/10.

Risk score
7.9
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 28% Stable renters 43% Owners 29%
Tract context
Occupied units1,163
Renter share70.2%
SVI overall0.36
Poverty rate11.7%
Median income$81,272

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 tracts In Red Bank
Very High
Within county
89 th percentile
Rank, 89th percentileLowHigh
#18 of 154 tracts In Monmouth County
High
Within state
81 th percentile
Rank, 81st percentileLowHigh
#421 of 2,175 tracts In New Jersey
High
National
90 th percentile
Rank, 90th percentileLowHigh
#8,653 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Red Bank and the region

Centroid at 40.3505, -74.0721 · click any tract to drill in

Why Red Bank scores 7.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Red Bank
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
11.7% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$2,039 rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Red Bank
5.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Red Bank
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Red Bank
5.3

How Red Bank compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Red Bank risk score vs. parent city / county / state7.9This tracttract 8036016.6Red Bankparent city5.7Countyavg tract in county6.0Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 36

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Red Bank

It sits 2.2 points above the Monmouth County average of 5.7. 25% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.5/10.

70% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby. Cost burden runs 39% here against 47.3% across Monmouth County. SNAP participation runs 6.7% against 15.2% nationally.

Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 2.9/10. Food insecurity runs 10.6% against 17.8% nationally. Nationally it ranks #8,653 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the NJ average is 6.0, so this tract runs 1.9 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.

Average gross rent is $2,039, close to the Red Bank average.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 34025803601

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34025803601?

Census tract 34025803601 in Red Bank scores 7.9/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 34025803601?

Median gross rent is $2,039/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 34025803601?

11.7% of residents in tract 34025803601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,079.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 34025803601?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 36th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 13th, household 16th, minority 35th, housing 92th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 34025803601 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 34025803601 compare to Red Bank overall?

Tract 34025803601 scores 7.9/10, higher than the parent city of Red Bank at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Red Bank; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Red Bank

Top eight tracts in Red Bank ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related