Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #59,654 of 84,120 nationally
Parkers Creek Eviction Risk: Lower , Little Silver
Tract 34025804200 · Monmouth County, NJ · pop 6,104 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
Census tract 34025804200 covers part of the Parkers Creek area of Little Silver, NJ, and scores 3.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 6,104. The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 10/10.
Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0%
Stable renters 4%
Owners 96%
Tract context
Occupied units2,252
Renter share4.3%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate2.4%
Median income$220,746
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
5
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
8
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Little Silver and the region
Centroid at 40.3370, -74.0345 · click any tract to drill in
Why Parkers Creek scores 3.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Little Silver
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Little Silver
1.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Little Silver
2.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Little Silver
1.9
How Parkers Creek compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 1
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 2%Socioeconomic
- 11%Household composition
- 1%Racial/ethnic minority
- 5%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 1Total filings over 1 yrs
- 0.81%Avg annual filing rate
- 0.8%Peak (2013)
- 1Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Parkers Creek. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 4.5%Housing insecurity
- 3.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 4.4%Food insecurity
- 2.3%SNAP enrollment
- 3.1%Transit barriers
- 4.0%No health insurance
- 11.2%Frequent mental distress
- 17.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Parkers Creek
The voucher gap is 71.6%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Against the Monmouth County average of 5.7, this tract reads safer for landlords by 2.3 points.
Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10. Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.5/10.
Food insecurity runs 4.4% against 17.8% nationally. Court records carry 1 eviction filings across 1 observed years.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.0% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Filings peaked in 2013 at 0.8% of renter households.
In a typical year about 0.8% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 29% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
At 4% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.1/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the NJ average is 6.0, so this tract runs 2.6 points cooler.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 34025804200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34025804200?
Census tract 34025804200 in the Parkers Creek neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34025804200?
Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 0% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34025804200?
2.4% of residents in tract 34025804200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,104.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34025804200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 11th, minority 1th, housing 5th.
Q5
Is tract 34025804200 considered part of Parkers Creek?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34025804200 fall within Parkers Creek (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34025804200?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 1 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 34025804200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.81% of renter households, peaking at 0.8% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 34025804200 struggle to pay rent?
About 4.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 34025804200 compare to Little Silver overall?
Tract 34025804200 scores 3.4/10, lower than the parent city of Little Silver at 4.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Little Silver; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related