Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #82,639 of 84,120 nationally
Parkers Creek Eviction Risk: Lower , Little Silver
Tract 34025804200 · Monmouth County, NJ · pop 6,104 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
In the Parkers Creek area of Little Silver, census tract 34025804200 scores 4.6/10 for eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #62,772 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
0% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $3,501 a month against an average household income of $220,746 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 4% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
1.1
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0%
Stable renters 4%
Owners 96%
Tract context
Occupied units2,252
Renter share4.3%
SVI overall0.01
Poverty rate2.4%
Median income$220,746
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
3
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
3
th percentile
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Little Silver and the region
Centroid at 40.3370, -74.0345 · click any tract to drill in
Why Parkers Creek scores 1.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Little Silver
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Little Silver
1.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Little Silver
2.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Little Silver
1.9
How Parkers Creek compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 1
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 2%Socioeconomic
- 11%Household composition
- 1%Racial/ethnic minority
- 5%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 1Total filings over 1 yrs
- 0.81%Avg annual filing rate
- 0.8%Peak (2013)
- 1Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Parkers Creek. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 4.5%Housing insecurity
- 3.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 4.4%Food insecurity
- 2.3%SNAP enrollment
- 3.1%Transit barriers
- 4.0%No health insurance
- 11.2%Frequent mental distress
- 17.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Parkers Creek
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Little Silver, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well below the Monmouth County average of 6.3 and below the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 1 eviction filings here over 1 tracked years, with about 0.8% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 0.8% of renter households in 2013.
In CDC survey modeling, about 4.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 34025804200
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34025804200?
Census tract 34025804200 in the Parkers Creek neighborhood scores 1.1/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34025804200?
Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 0% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34025804200?
2.4% of residents in tract 34025804200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,104.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34025804200?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 1th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 11th, minority 1th, housing 5th.
Q5
Is tract 34025804200 considered part of Parkers Creek?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34025804200 fall within Parkers Creek (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34025804200?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 1 eviction filings across 1 validated years in tract 34025804200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 0.81% of renter households, peaking at 0.8% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 34025804200 struggle to pay rent?
About 4.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 34025804200 compare to Little Silver overall?
Tract 34025804200 scores 1.1/10, lower than the parent city of Little Silver at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Little Silver; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related