Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #15,451 of 84,120 nationally
Parkers Creek Eviction Risk: Elevated , Little Silver
Tract 34025812300 · Monmouth County, NJ · pop 5,407 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
34025812300 is a census tract in the Parkers Creek area of Shrewsbury, NJ. It scores 6.5/10 for landlords. It is home to 5,407 residents. Severe burden reaches 57%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
6.5
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units1,986
Renter share19.6%
SVI overall0.45
Poverty rate5.6%
Median income$109,583
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
67
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
63
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Little Silver and the region
Centroid at 40.3265, -74.0574 · click any tract to drill in
Why Parkers Creek scores 6.5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Little Silver
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
5.6% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$2,310 rent vs county FMR
6.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Little Silver
9.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Little Silver
3.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Little Silver
6.1
How Parkers Creek compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 45
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 20%Socioeconomic
- 65%Household composition
- 34%Racial/ethnic minority
- 73%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 59Total filings over 2 yrs
- 8.74%Avg annual filing rate
- 8.4%Peak (2013)
- 27Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Parkers Creek. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.2%Housing insecurity
- 4.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.9%Food insecurity
- 4.7%SNAP enrollment
- 4.8%Transit barriers
- 6.4%No health insurance
- 13.3%Frequent mental distress
- 22.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Parkers Creek
64% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well above the Monmouth County average of 47.3%. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 9.6/10.
Average gross rent is $2,310, 33% below the Shrewsbury average. Running cool, economic stress reads 1.4/10. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 8.5/10.
SNAP participation runs 4.7% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 7.9% against 17.8% nationally.
Court records carry 59 eviction filings across 2 observed years. It sits 0.8 points above the Monmouth County average of 5.7.
The voucher gap is 13.2%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. The worst year on record was 2013, when 8.4% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 8.7% of renter households face a filing.
Nationally it ranks #15,451 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 20% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 5.1/10.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 34025812300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34025812300?
Census tract 34025812300 in the Parkers Creek neighborhood scores 6.5/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34025812300?
Median gross rent is $2,310/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 64% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34025812300?
5.6% of residents in tract 34025812300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,407.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34025812300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 45th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 20th, household 65th, minority 34th, housing 73th.
Q5
Is tract 34025812300 considered part of Parkers Creek?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34025812300 fall within Parkers Creek (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34025812300?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 59 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 34025812300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.74% of renter households, peaking at 8.4% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 34025812300 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 34025812300 compare to Little Silver overall?
Tract 34025812300 scores 6.5/10, higher than the parent city of Little Silver at 4.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Little Silver; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related