Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #63,481 of 84,120 nationally
Parkers Creek Eviction Risk: Lower , Little Silver
Tract 34025812300 · Monmouth County, NJ · pop 5,407 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi
Landlord eviction risk in census tract 34025812300 (Parkers Creek in Little Silver, New Jersey) comes in at 6.7/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than roughly 90% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
About 64% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 57% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $2,310 a month against an average household income of $109,583 a year, roughly 25% of income at the averages. About 20% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 80%
Tract context
Occupied units1,986
Renter share19.6%
SVI overall0.45
Poverty rate5.6%
Median income$109,583
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
54
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
32
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Little Silver and the region
Centroid at 40.3265, -74.0574 · click any tract to drill in
Why Parkers Creek scores 2.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Little Silver
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
New Jersey legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
5.6% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$2,310 rent vs county FMR
6.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Little Silver
9.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Little Silver
3.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Little Silver
6.1
How Parkers Creek compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 45
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 20%Socioeconomic
- 65%Household composition
- 34%Racial/ethnic minority
- 73%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 59Total filings over 2 yrs
- 8.74%Avg annual filing rate
- 8.4%Peak (2013)
- 27Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Parkers Creek. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.2%Housing insecurity
- 4.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 7.9%Food insecurity
- 4.7%SNAP enrollment
- 4.8%Transit barriers
- 6.4%No health insurance
- 13.3%Frequent mental distress
- 22.8%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Parkers Creek
The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 9.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Little Silver, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Monmouth County average of 6.3 and in line with the New Jersey statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton eviction risk's Eviction Lab logged 59 eviction filings here over 2 tracked years, with about 8.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 8.4% of renter households in 2013.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 45th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 34025812300
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34025812300?
Census tract 34025812300 in the Parkers Creek neighborhood scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 34025812300?
Median gross rent is $2,310/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 64% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 34025812300?
5.6% of residents in tract 34025812300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,407.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 34025812300?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 45th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 20th, household 65th, minority 34th, housing 73th.
Q5
Is tract 34025812300 considered part of Parkers Creek?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 34025812300 fall within Parkers Creek (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 34025812300?
Princeton eviction risk Eviction Lab recorded 59 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 34025812300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.74% of renter households, peaking at 8.4% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 34025812300 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 34025812300 compare to Little Silver overall?
Tract 34025812300 scores 2.7/10, lower than the parent city of Little Silver at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Little Silver; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related