Union Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 34039032701 · Union County, NJ · pop 3,768 · 2% of tract blocks fall in Union
With a score of 5.3/10, tract 34039032701 in Union, NJ reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,768 residents. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 8.9/10.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Union and the region
Centroid at 40.7037, -74.2804 · click any tract to drill in
Why Union scores 5.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Union compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 41
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 36%Socioeconomic
- 36%Household composition
- 80%Racial/ethnic minority
- 40%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 27%Grade B
- 8%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 11.7%Housing insecurity
- 6.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 11.7%Food insecurity
- 5.8%SNAP enrollment
- 6.4%Transit barriers
- 9.9%No health insurance
- 13.8%Frequent mental distress
- 20.2%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Union
Average gross rent is $2,414, 34% above the Union average. Running cool, economic stress reads 1.2/10.
It sits 1.3 points below the Union County average of 6.6. 14% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Against Union County at 44.6%, 38% of renters here are cost-burdened. SNAP participation runs 5.8% against 15.2% nationally.
Running hot, local political climate reads 7.1/10. The voucher gap is 12.8%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
Nationally it ranks #28,095 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. At 22% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
About tract 34039032701
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 34039032701?
What is the average rent in tract 34039032701?
What is the poverty rate in tract 34039032701?
How socially vulnerable is tract 34039032701?
What share of households in tract 34039032701 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 34039032701 compare to Union overall?
Was tract 34039032701 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Union
Top eight tracts in Union ranked by composite eviction-risk score.