Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #2,657 of 84,120 nationally

Upper Falls Eviction Risk: High , Rochester

Tract 36055001300 · Monroe County, NY · pop 1,860 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

With a score of 9.5/10, tract 36055001300 in the Upper Falls area of Rochester, NY reads high for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 1,860. SNAP participation runs 43.7% against 15.2% nationally.

Risk score
9.5
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 38% Stable renters 61% Owners 1%
Tract context
Occupied units596
Renter share99.5%
SVI overall1.00
Poverty rate32.0%
Median income$28,667

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Upper Falls
Moderate
Within parent city
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#40 of 84 tracts In Rochester
Moderate
Within county
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#39 of 210 tracts In Monroe County
High
Within state
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#1,271 of 5,394 tracts In New York
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Rochester and the region

Centroid at 43.1698, -77.6070 · click any tract to drill in

Why Upper Falls scores 9.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rochester
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.1
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
32.0% poverty · this tract
8.0
Supply constraint
$716 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rochester
7.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rochester
7.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rochester
7.0

How Upper Falls compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Upper Falls risk score vs. parent city / county / state9.5This tracttract 0013008.1Rochesterparent city7.2Countyavg tract in county7.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 100

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Upper Falls. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Upper Falls

Food insecurity runs 43.4% against 17.8% nationally. This is renter territory: 100% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. Pulling hardest the other way is supply constraint at 1/10.

It sits 2.3 points above the Monroe County average of 7.2. At $716 a month, rents run 34% under what the rest of Rochester commands.

The poverty rate is 32%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. Sitting well above the midpoint, economic stress reads 8/10. 38% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Monroe County average of 46.4%.

Severe burden reaches 14%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Running hot, local political climate reads 7.5/10.

This ground was mapped D ("Hazardous") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Rochester. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. On the national scale it lands near the 97th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 10/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the NY average is 7.7, so this tract runs 1.8 points hotter.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 36055001300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36055001300?

Census tract 36055001300 in the Upper Falls neighborhood scores 9.5/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36055001300?

Median gross rent is $716/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36055001300?

32.0% of residents in tract 36055001300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,860.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36055001300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 100th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 99th, household 100th, minority 96th, housing 87th.
Q5

Is tract 36055001300 considered part of Upper Falls?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36055001300 fall within Upper Falls (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36055001300 struggle to pay rent?

About 34.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 21.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36055001300 compare to Rochester overall?

Tract 36055001300 scores 9.5/10, higher than the parent city of Rochester at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rochester eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36055001300 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 100% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Rochester

Top eight tracts in Rochester ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related