Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #12,481 of 84,120 nationally

Rosedale Eviction Risk: Elevated , Valley Stream

Tract 36059410900 · Nassau County, NY · pop 6,529 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

With a score of 7.1/10, tract 36059410900 in the Rosedale area of South Valley Stream, NY reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 6,529 residents. Cost burden runs 67% here against 44.5% across Nassau County.

Risk score
7.1
Elevated
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 7% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,918
Renter share22.1%
SVI overall0.60
Poverty rate12.7%
Median income$138,783

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Rosedale
Very High
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Valley Stream
Moderate
Within county
78 th percentile
Rank, 78th percentileLowHigh
#63 of 281 tracts In Nassau County
High
Within state
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#3,316 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Valley Stream and the region

Centroid at 40.6558, -73.7185 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rosedale scores 7.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Valley Stream
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
12.7% poverty · this tract
3.2
Supply constraint
$1,839 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Valley Stream
8.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Valley Stream
5.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Valley Stream
7.1

How Rosedale compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rosedale risk score vs. parent city / county / state7.1This tracttract 4109006.6Valley Streamparent city6.5Countyavg tract in county7.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 60

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Rosedale. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rosedale

The score leans hardest on rent-regulation exposure at 8.1/10. Severe burden reaches 17%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Running cool, supply constraint reads 2.1/10.

At $1,839 a month, rents run 22% over what the rest of South Valley Stream commands. On the high side, local political climate reads 7.5/10.

This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Queens. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #12,481 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

At 22% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6.4/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Rent consumes only 16% of average household income of $138,783, an unusually wide affordability cushion. It tracks the Nassau County average of 6.5 closely.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 36059410900

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36059410900?

Census tract 36059410900 in the Rosedale neighborhood scores 7.1/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36059410900?

Median gross rent is $1,839/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 67% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36059410900?

12.7% of residents in tract 36059410900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,529.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36059410900?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 60th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 48th, household 52th, minority 76th, housing 63th.
Q5

Is tract 36059410900 considered part of Rosedale?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36059410900 fall within Rosedale (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36059410900 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36059410900 compare to Valley Stream overall?

Tract 36059410900 scores 7.1/10, higher than the parent city of Valley Stream at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Valley Stream eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36059410900 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related