Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #35,899 of 84,120 nationally
Rosedale Eviction Risk: Moderate , Valley Stream
Tract 36059410900 · Nassau County, NY · pop 6,529 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
For landlords sizing up the Rosedale neighborhood of Valley Stream, census tract 36059410900 carries an elevated eviction-risk score of 6.3/10. On the national scale it ranks #14,853 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
About 67% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,839 a month against an average household income of $138,783 a year, roughly 16% of income at the averages. About 22% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
4.3
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units1,918
Renter share22.1%
SVI overall0.60
Poverty rate12.7%
Median income$138,783
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
89
th percentile
High
Within state
25
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Valley Stream and the region
Centroid at 40.6558, -73.7185 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rosedale scores 4.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Valley Stream
7.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
12.7% poverty · this tract
3.2
Supply constraint
$1,839 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Valley Stream
8.1
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
7.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Valley Stream
5.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Valley Stream
7.1
How Rosedale compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 60
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 48%Socioeconomic
- 52%Household composition
- 76%Racial/ethnic minority
- 63%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 6%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Rosedale. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 13.6%Housing insecurity
- 7.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 15.4%Food insecurity
- 11.6%SNAP enrollment
- 8.0%Transit barriers
- 6.2%No health insurance
- 13.9%Frequent mental distress
- 25.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Rosedale
What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 8.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Valley Stream eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Nassau County average of 5.5 and in line with the New York statewide average of 6.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
HOLC surveyors mapped this tract in the 1930s with a dominant grade of C ("Declining"), above the redlined D tier. The grading still shaped decades of lending and development in the surrounding area.
The tract is White and Asian and ranks around the 60th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.
Frequently asked
About tract 36059410900
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36059410900?
Census tract 36059410900 in the Rosedale neighborhood scores 4.3/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 36059410900?
Median gross rent is $1,839/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 67% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 36059410900?
12.7% of residents in tract 36059410900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,529.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 36059410900?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 60th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 48th, household 52th, minority 76th, housing 63th.
Q5
Is tract 36059410900 considered part of Rosedale?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36059410900 fall within Rosedale (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 36059410900 struggle to pay rent?
About 13.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 36059410900 compare to Valley Stream overall?
Tract 36059410900 scores 4.3/10, lower than the parent city of Valley Stream at 8.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Valley Stream eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 36059410900 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related