Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #17,650 of 84,120 nationally
Rosedale Eviction Risk: Elevated , Valley Stream
Tract 36059410400 · Nassau County, NY · pop 5,116 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi
Tract 36059410400 sits in the Rosedale area of Valley Stream eviction risk, NY, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6.1/10. Population here is 5,116. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10.
Risk score
6.1
Elevated
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4%
Stable renters 4%
Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units1,360
Renter share7.7%
SVI overall0.15
Poverty rate2.5%
Median income$150,381
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
40
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
39
th percentile
Low
Within state
28
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Valley Stream and the region
Centroid at 40.6670, -73.7188 · click any tract to drill in
Why Rosedale scores 6.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Valley Stream
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
2.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,420 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Valley Stream
7.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Valley Stream
4.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Valley Stream
5.2
How Rosedale compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 15
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 26%Socioeconomic
- 13%Household composition
- 89%Racial/ethnic minority
- 8%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 5%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Rosedale. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 15.8%Housing insecurity
- 8.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 16.2%Food insecurity
- 10.9%SNAP enrollment
- 8.3%Transit barriers
- 7.8%No health insurance
- 14.1%Frequent mental distress
- 23.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Rosedale
On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 7.8/10. Against Nassau County at 44.5%, 50% of renters here are cost-burdened. Running hot, state political climate reads 7.3/10.
Average gross rent is $2,420, 14% above the Valley Stream average. This ground was mapped C ("Definitely Declining") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Queens. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #17,650 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
At 8% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 2.4/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Statewide the NY average is 7.7, so this tract runs 1.6 points cooler. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
It tracks the Nassau County average of 6.5 closely. Annual rent works out to 19% of average household income of $150,381.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 36059410400
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36059410400?
Census tract 36059410400 in the Rosedale neighborhood scores 6.1/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 36059410400?
Median gross rent is $2,420/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 36059410400?
2.5% of residents in tract 36059410400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,116.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 36059410400?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 15th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 26th, household 13th, minority 89th, housing 8th.
Q5
Is tract 36059410400 considered part of Rosedale?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36059410400 fall within Rosedale (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 36059410400 struggle to pay rent?
About 15.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 36059410400 compare to Valley Stream overall?
Tract 36059410400 scores 6.1/10, lower than the parent city of Valley Stream at 6.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Valley Stream eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8
Was tract 36059410400 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Valley Stream
Top eight tracts in Valley Stream ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related