Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #14,316 of 84,120 nationally

Regency Park North Eviction Risk: Moderate , Glens Falls

Tract 36113070400 · Warren County, NY · pop 3,826 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

How risky is the Regency Park North area of Glens Falls for landlords? Census tract 36113070400 scores 6.1/10, the Elevated tier. On the national scale it ranks #19,252 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

54% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 30% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,093 a month against an average household income of $65,325 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 43% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
5.8
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 20% Owners 57%
Tract context
Occupied units1,743
Renter share42.6%
SVI overall0.59
Poverty rate11.7%
Median income$65,325

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Regency Park North
Very High
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 5 tracts In Glens Falls
Moderate
Within county
77 th percentile
Rank, 77th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 23 tracts In Warren County
High
Within state
43 th percentile
Rank, 43rd percentileLowHigh
#3,063 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Glens Falls and the region

Centroid at 43.3204, -73.6391 · click any tract to drill in

Why Regency Park North scores 5.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Glens Falls
4.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.0
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
11.7% poverty · this tract
2.9
Supply constraint
$1,093 rent vs county FMR
3.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Glens Falls
5.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Glens Falls
9.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Glens Falls
5.7

How Regency Park North compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Regency Park North risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.85.8This tracttract 070400Glens Falls: 7.97.9Glens Fallsparent cityCounty: 4.84.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 5.95.9Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 59

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Regency Park North. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Regency Park North

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 9.1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Glens Falls, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Warren County average of 5.5 and in line with the New York statewide average of 6.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 59th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.9% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 36113070400

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36113070400?

Census tract 36113070400 in the Regency Park North neighborhood scores 5.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36113070400?

Median gross rent is $1,093/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36113070400?

11.7% of residents in tract 36113070400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,826.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36113070400?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 59th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 63th, household 27th, minority 18th, housing 81th.
Q5

Is tract 36113070400 considered part of Regency Park North?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36113070400 fall within Regency Park North (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36113070400 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36113070400 compare to Glens Falls overall?

Tract 36113070400 scores 5.8/10, lower than the parent city of Glens Falls at 7.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Glens Falls; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Glens Falls

Top eight tracts in Glens Falls ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related