Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #14,308 of 84,120 nationally

Murray Hill Eviction Risk: Elevated , Scarsdale

Tract 36119010702 · Westchester County, NY · pop 5,794 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Census tract 36119010702 covers part of the Murray Hill area of Westchester County, NY, and scores 6.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 5,794 residents. Against Westchester County at 47.2%, 57% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
6.7
Elevated
Confidence 65% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 9% Owners 78%
Tract context
Occupied units2,731
Renter share22.0%
SVI overall0.35
Poverty rate8.6%
Median income$118,826

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
75 th percentile
Rank, 75th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 5 tracts In Murray Hill
High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Scarsdale
Very High
Within county
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#163 of 241 tracts In Westchester County
Low
Within state
35 th percentile
Rank, 35th percentileLowHigh
#3,504 of 5,394 tracts In New York
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Scarsdale and the region

Centroid at 41.0037, -73.8089 · click any tract to drill in

Why Murray Hill scores 6.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Scarsdale
7.3
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.8
State political climate
New York legislature & governorship
7.3
Economic stress
8.6% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$2,650 rent vs county FMR
4.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Scarsdale
7.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Scarsdale
4.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Scarsdale
5.0

How Murray Hill compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Murray Hill risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.76.7This tracttract 010702Scarsdale: 6.46.4Scarsdaleparent cityCounty: 7.87.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 7.77.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 35

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: A: Best

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Murray Hill. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Murray Hill

Pulling hardest the other way is economic stress at 2.1/10. The severe-burden share is 16%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.

Disability prevalence runs 18.8% against 31.5% nationally. Sitting well above the midpoint, state political climate reads 7.3/10.

It sits 1.1 points below the Westchester County average of 7.8. On the high side, local political climate reads 7.3/10.

Adults with no health insurance runs 3.8% against 11.3% nationally. This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Lower Westchester Co. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. Nationally it ranks #14,308 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

At 22% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. Social vulnerability reads 4.2/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the NY average is 7.7, so this tract runs 1.0 points cooler.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 36119010702

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 36119010702?

Census tract 36119010702 in the Murray Hill neighborhood scores 6.7/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 36119010702?

Median gross rent is $2,650/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 36119010702?

8.6% of residents in tract 36119010702 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,794.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 36119010702?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 35th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 21th, household 19th, minority 58th, housing 70th.
Q5

Is tract 36119010702 considered part of Murray Hill?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 36119010702 fall within Murray Hill (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 36119010702 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 36119010702 compare to Scarsdale overall?

Tract 36119010702 scores 6.7/10, higher than the parent city of Scarsdale at 6.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Scarsdale; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 36119010702 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Scarsdale

Top eight tracts in Scarsdale ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related