Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #48,083 of 84,120 nationally

Jefferson Oaks Eviction Risk: Lower , Rural Hall

Tract 37067002808 · Forsyth County, NC · pop 4,087 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Census tract 37067002808 sits in the Jefferson Oaks area of Rural Hall, North Carolina eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of $1/10. It lands near the 74th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 49% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 35% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,048 a month against an average household income of $60,208 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. Renters make up 30% of occupied homes.

Risk score
3.6
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 16% Owners 69%
Tract context
Occupied units1,692
Renter share30.4%
SVI overall0.35
Poverty rate6.0%
Median income$60,208

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Jefferson Oaks
Moderate
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Rural Hall
Very Low
Within county
44 th percentile
Rank, 44th percentileLowHigh
#54 of 95 tracts In Forsyth County
Moderate
Within state
48 th percentile
Rank, 48th percentileLowHigh
#1,398 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Rural Hall and the region

Centroid at 36.2420, -80.3175 · click any tract to drill in

Why Jefferson Oaks scores 3.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rural Hall
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
6.0% poverty · this tract
1.5
Supply constraint
$1,048 rent vs county FMR
4.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rural Hall
5.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rural Hall
6.9
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rural Hall
6.3

How Jefferson Oaks compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Jefferson Oaks risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.63.6This tracttract 002808Rural Hall: 3.03.0Rural Hallparent cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 35

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 215Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 15.77%Avg annual filing rate
  • 22.0%Peak (2010)
  • 67Filings in 2012 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2005 to 2012
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 370670028082005: 27 filings (10.11/100 renter HHs)2006: 38 filings (14.23/100 renter HHs)2010: 83 filings (22.02/100 renter HHs)2012: 67 filings (16.71/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 148% over the past 4 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Jefferson Oaks

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at 6.9/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rural Hall, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Forsyth County average of 5.5 and above the North Carolina statewide average of 5.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 35th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 10.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 37067002808

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37067002808?

Census tract 37067002808 in the Jefferson Oaks neighborhood scores 3.6/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 37067002808?

Median gross rent is $1,048/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 37067002808?

6.0% of residents in tract 37067002808 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,087.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 37067002808?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 35th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 63th, household 7th, minority 40th, housing 33th.
Q5

Is tract 37067002808 considered part of Jefferson Oaks?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37067002808 fall within Jefferson Oaks (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37067002808?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 215 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 37067002808 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 15.77% of renter households, peaking at 22.0% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 37067002808 struggle to pay rent?

About 10.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 37067002808 compare to Rural Hall overall?

Tract 37067002808 scores 3.6/10, higher than the parent city of Rural Hall at 3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rural Hall; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Rural Hall

Top eight tracts in Rural Hall ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related