Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #35,669 of 84,120 nationally
Lincoln Heights Eviction Risk: Moderate , Greensboro
Tract 37081011102 · Guilford County, NC · pop 2,311 · neighborhood within 0.1 mi
37081011102 is a census tract in the Lincoln Heights area of Greensboro, NC. It scores 4.8/10 for landlords. It is home to 2,311 residents. The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.5/10.
Risk score
4.8
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13%
Stable renters 23%
Owners 64%
Tract context
Occupied units1,015
Renter share35.8%
SVI overall0.75
Poverty rate18.7%
Median income$51,250
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
58
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
69
th percentile
Elevated
Within state
75
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Greensboro and the region
Centroid at 36.0535, -79.7574 · click any tract to drill in
Why Lincoln Heights scores 4.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Greensboro
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
18.7% poverty · this tract
4.7
Supply constraint
$1,163 rent vs county FMR
5.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Greensboro
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Greensboro
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Greensboro
3.5
How Lincoln Heights compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 75
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 78%Socioeconomic
- 83%Household composition
- 97%Racial/ethnic minority
- 34%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 1%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 463Total filings over 5 yrs
- 17.72%Avg annual filing rate
- 22.7%Peak (2013)
- 81Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 5 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 24.1%Housing insecurity
- 17.3%Utility-shutoff threat
- 30.3%Food insecurity
- 28.9%SNAP enrollment
- 15.1%Transit barriers
- 13.1%No health insurance
- 17.8%Frequent mental distress
- 41.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Lincoln Heights
On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.5/10. roughly one in three of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, lower than the Guilford County average of 44.7%.
SNAP participation runs 28.9% against 15.2% nationally. Food insecurity runs 30.3% against 17.8% nationally. The severe-burden share is 13%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2.3/10. The poverty rate is 19%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.
The filing record is not thin: 463 evictions over 5 years of observation. It sits 0.8 points above the Guilford County average of 4.0.
The worst year on record was 2013, when 22.7% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 37081011102
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37081011102?
Census tract 37081011102 in the Lincoln Heights neighborhood scores 4.8/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 37081011102?
Median gross rent is $1,163/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 37081011102?
18.7% of residents in tract 37081011102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,311.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 37081011102?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 75th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 78th, household 83th, minority 97th, housing 34th.
Q5
Is tract 37081011102 considered part of Lincoln Heights?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37081011102 fall within Lincoln Heights (neighborhood centroid within 0.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37081011102?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 463 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 37081011102 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 17.72% of renter households, peaking at 22.7% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 37081011102 struggle to pay rent?
About 24.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 17.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 37081011102 compare to Greensboro overall?
Tract 37081011102 scores 4.8/10, higher than the parent city of Greensboro at 3.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Greensboro eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 37081011102 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 1% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Greensboro
Top eight tracts in Greensboro ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · NC
Oakwood
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
37081010602
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Pomona
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
King's Pond
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Warnersville
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Woodberry Forest
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Coventry Glen
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · NC
Nocho Park
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Related