Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #39,389 of 84,120 nationally

Rolling Roads Eviction Risk: Moderate , Greensboro

Tract 37081012610 · Guilford County, NC · pop 3,117 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Rolling Roads in Greensboro is where census tract 37081012610 sits, home to 3,117 residents. Its landlord eviction-risk score is 5.8/10. That is riskier than about 67% of US census tracts.

66% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 18% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,536 monthly, set against $54,688 in average yearly household income, roughly 34% of income at the averages. Renters make up 39% of occupied homes.

Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 26% Stable renters 13% Owners 61%
Tract context
Occupied units1,141
Renter share39.2%
SVI overall0.78
Poverty rate8.5%
Median income$54,688

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Rolling Roads
Moderate
Within parent city
37 th percentile
Rank, 37th percentileLowHigh
#52 of 82 tracts In Greensboro
Low
Within county
48 th percentile
Rank, 48th percentileLowHigh
#66 of 126 tracts In Guilford County
Moderate
Within state
60 th percentile
Rank, 60th percentileLowHigh
#1,055 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Greensboro and the region

Centroid at 36.0334, -79.8325 · click any tract to drill in

Why Rolling Roads scores 4.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Greensboro
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
8.5% poverty · this tract
2.1
Supply constraint
$1,536 rent vs county FMR
8.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Greensboro
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Greensboro
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Greensboro
3.5

How Rolling Roads compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Rolling Roads risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.14.1This tracttract 012610Greensboro: 3.23.2Greensboroparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 78

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 316Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 18.67%Avg annual filing rate
  • 21.4%Peak (2014)
  • 57Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2005 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 370810126102005: 63 filings (23.31/100 renter HHs)2013: 59 filings (16.62/100 renter HHs)2014: 76 filings (21.41/100 renter HHs)2015: 61 filings (17.18/100 renter HHs)2016: 57 filings (14.84/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 5 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Rolling Roads

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 8.4/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Greensboro eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Guilford County average of 5.5 and above the North Carolina statewide average of 5.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 18.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 11.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is Black and Asian and ranks around the 78th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 37081012610

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37081012610?

Census tract 37081012610 in the Rolling Roads neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 37081012610?

Median gross rent is $1,536/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 66% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 37081012610?

8.5% of residents in tract 37081012610 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,117.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 37081012610?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 78th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 75th, household 57th, minority 87th, housing 72th.
Q5

Is tract 37081012610 considered part of Rolling Roads?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37081012610 fall within Rolling Roads (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37081012610?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 316 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 37081012610 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 18.67% of renter households, peaking at 21.4% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 37081012610 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 37081012610 compare to Greensboro overall?

Tract 37081012610 scores 4.1/10, higher than the parent city of Greensboro at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Greensboro eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Greensboro

Top eight tracts in Greensboro ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related