Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #34,332 of 84,120 nationally

Hunter Hills Eviction Risk: Moderate , Greensboro

Tract 37081012617 · Guilford County, NC · pop 3,950 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

With a score of $1/10, tract 37081012617 in the Hunter Hills area of Greensboro ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 3,950 residents. That is riskier than about 38% of US census tracts.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 26% of renter households, a moderate level, and 13% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $960 monthly, set against $58,083 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 50% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 13% Stable renters 37% Owners 50%
Tract context
Occupied units1,473
Renter share50.4%
SVI overall0.69
Poverty rate13.2%
Median income$58,083

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Hunter Hills
Moderate
Within parent city
47 th percentile
Rank, 47th percentileLowHigh
#44 of 82 tracts In Greensboro
Moderate
Within county
58 th percentile
Rank, 58th percentileLowHigh
#54 of 126 tracts In Guilford County
Elevated
Within state
69 th percentile
Rank, 69th percentileLowHigh
#827 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Greensboro and the region

Centroid at 36.0414, -79.8686 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hunter Hills scores 4.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Greensboro
6.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
13.2% poverty · this tract
3.3
Supply constraint
$960 rent vs county FMR
3.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Greensboro
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Greensboro
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Greensboro
3.5

How Hunter Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Hunter Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.44.4This tracttract 012617Greensboro: 3.23.2Greensboroparent cityCounty: 4.14.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 69

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 864Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 23.44%Avg annual filing rate
  • 40.3%Peak (2005)
  • 170Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2005 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 370810126172005: 307 filings (40.34/100 renter HHs)2013: 140 filings (18.69/100 renter HHs)2014: 127 filings (16.96/100 renter HHs)2015: 120 filings (16.02/100 renter HHs)2016: 170 filings (25.19/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 45% over the past 5 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hunter Hills

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 4.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Greensboro eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Guilford County average of 5.5 and in line with the North Carolina statewide average of 5.3. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is racially mixed and ranks around the 69th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 864 eviction filings here over 5 tracked years, with about 23.4% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 40.3% of renter households in 2005.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 37081012617

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37081012617?

Census tract 37081012617 in the Hunter Hills neighborhood scores 4.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 37081012617?

Median gross rent is $960/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 26% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 37081012617?

13.2% of residents in tract 37081012617 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,950.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 37081012617?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 69th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 64th, household 85th, minority 88th, housing 38th.
Q5

Is tract 37081012617 considered part of Hunter Hills?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37081012617 fall within Hunter Hills (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37081012617?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 864 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 37081012617 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 23.44% of renter households, peaking at 40.3% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 37081012617 struggle to pay rent?

About 22.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 37081012617 compare to Greensboro overall?

Tract 37081012617 scores 4.4/10, higher than the parent city of Greensboro at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Greensboro eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Greensboro

Top eight tracts in Greensboro ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related