Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #79,124 of 84,120 nationally

Matthews Commercial Historic District Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 37119005865 · Mecklenburg County, NC · pop 2,098 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

In the Matthews Commercial Historic District neighborhood of Matthews, census tract 37119005865 scores $1/10 for eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #52,073 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

23% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a moderate level, and 6% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,499 monthly, set against $123,125 in average yearly household income, roughly 15% of income at the averages. About 29% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 23% Owners 70%
Tract context
Occupied units868
Renter share29.3%
SVI overall0.25
Poverty rate3.6%
Median income$123,125

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Matthews Commercial Historic District
Low
Within parent city
29 th percentile
Rank, 29th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 8 tracts In Matthews
Low
Within county
5 th percentile
Rank, 5th percentileLowHigh
#289 of 305 tracts In Mecklenburg County
Very Low
Within state
5 th percentile
Rank, 5th percentileLowHigh
#2,531 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Matthews and the region

Centroid at 35.1240, -80.7376 · click any tract to drill in

Why Matthews Commercial Historic District scores 1.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Matthews
7.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.8
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
3.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,499 rent vs county FMR
3.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Matthews
4.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Matthews
7.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Matthews
3.6

How Matthews Commercial Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Matthews Commercial Historic District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.51.5This tracttract 005865Matthews: 2.52.5Matthewsparent cityCounty: 3.33.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 25

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Matthews Commercial Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Matthews Commercial Historic District

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 7.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Matthews eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Mecklenburg County average of 5.5 and in line with the North Carolina statewide average of 5.3. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.7% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.2% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 25th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 37119005865

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37119005865?

Census tract 37119005865 in the Matthews Commercial Historic District neighborhood scores 1.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 37119005865?

Median gross rent is $1,499/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 23% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 37119005865?

3.6% of residents in tract 37119005865 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,098.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 37119005865?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 25th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 26th, household 11th, minority 43th, housing 50th.
Q5

Is tract 37119005865 considered part of Matthews Commercial Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37119005865 fall within Matthews Commercial Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 37119005865 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 37119005865 compare to Matthews overall?

Tract 37119005865 scores 1.5/10, lower than the parent city of Matthews at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Matthews eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Matthews

Top eight tracts in Matthews ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related