Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #63,481 of 84,120 nationally

Chambers & Warlick, Incorporated Property Eviction Risk: Lower , Raleigh

Tract 37183052506 · Wake County, NC · pop 2,276 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Census tract 37183052506 belongs to Chambers & Warlick, Incorporated Property in Raleigh, North Carolina. It is home to 2,276 residents and scores 5.6/10, a moderate reading for landlords. It lands near the 60th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

61% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 33% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,553 a month against an average household income of $89,934 a year, roughly 21% of income at the averages. About 52% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
2.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31% Stable renters 20% Owners 49%
Tract context
Occupied units1,257
Renter share51.6%
SVI overall0.17
Poverty rate2.3%
Median income$89,934

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Chambers & Warlick, Incorporated Property
Moderate
Within parent city
36 th percentile
Rank, 36th percentileLowHigh
#71 of 111 tracts In Raleigh
Low
Within county
63 th percentile
Rank, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#86 of 230 tracts In Wake County
Elevated
Within state
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#2,023 of 2,660 tracts In North Carolina
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Raleigh and the region

Centroid at 35.8545, -78.6900 · click any tract to drill in

Why Chambers & Warlick, Incorporated Property scores 2.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Raleigh
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
2.3% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,553 rent vs county FMR
3.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Raleigh
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Raleigh
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Raleigh
4.0

How Chambers & Warlick, Incorporated Property compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Chambers & Warlick, Incorporated Property risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.72.7This tracttract 052506Raleigh: 3.33.3Raleighparent cityCounty: 2.52.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 17

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 217Total filings over 2 yrs
  • 18.47%Avg annual filing rate
  • 18.7%Peak (2016)
  • 133Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Chambers & Warlick, Incorporated Property

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 5.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Raleigh eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Wake County average of 5.3 and in line with the North Carolina statewide average of 5.3. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.0% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 17th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 37183052506

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37183052506?

Census tract 37183052506 in the Chambers & Warlick, Incorporated Property neighborhood scores 2.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 37183052506?

Median gross rent is $1,553/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 37183052506?

2.3% of residents in tract 37183052506 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,276.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 37183052506?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 17th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 27th, household 16th, minority 24th, housing 25th.
Q5

Is tract 37183052506 considered part of Chambers & Warlick, Incorporated Property?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37183052506 fall within Chambers & Warlick, Incorporated Property (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37183052506?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 217 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 37183052506 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 18.47% of renter households, peaking at 18.7% in 2016. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 37183052506 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 37183052506 compare to Raleigh overall?

Tract 37183052506 scores 2.7/10, lower than the parent city of Raleigh at 3.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Raleigh eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Raleigh

Top eight tracts in Raleigh ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related