Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #32,842 of 84,120 nationally
Neuse Ridge Eviction Risk: Moderate , Raleigh
Tract 37183054106 · Wake County, NC · pop 9,076 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
Tract 37183054106 sits in the Neuse Ridge area of Raleigh eviction risk, NC, carrying an eviction-risk score of 5/10. Population here is 9,076. The score leans hardest on court filing pressure at 9/10.
Risk score
5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21%
Stable renters 25%
Owners 54%
Tract context
Occupied units3,216
Renter share45.5%
SVI overall0.90
Poverty rate9.9%
Median income$75,309
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
58
th percentile
Elevated
Within county
77
th percentile
High
Within state
80
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Raleigh and the region
Centroid at 35.7763, -78.5520 · click any tract to drill in
Why Neuse Ridge scores 5
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Raleigh
7.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.3
State political climate
North Carolina legislature & governorship
2.3
Economic stress
9.9% poverty · this tract
2.5
Supply constraint
$1,492 rent vs county FMR
3.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Raleigh
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Raleigh
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Raleigh
4.0
How Neuse Ridge compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 90
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 79%Socioeconomic
- 80%Household composition
- 86%Racial/ethnic minority
- 92%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 201Total filings over 2 yrs
- 8.00%Avg annual filing rate
- 9.5%Peak (2015)
- 89Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 18.7%Housing insecurity
- 11.8%Utility-shutoff threat
- 22.5%Food insecurity
- 17.9%SNAP enrollment
- 11.6%Transit barriers
- 15.3%No health insurance
- 17.6%Frequent mental distress
- 30.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Neuse Ridge
Severe burden reaches 26%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 2/10.
Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 2.3/10. It sits 1.0 points above the Wake County average of 4.0. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 201 filings here across 2 tracked years.
The worst year on record was 2015, when 9.5% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 8.0% of renter households face a filing.
On the national scale it lands near the 61st percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 9.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.
Statewide the NC average is 4.0, so this tract runs 1.0 points hotter. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 37183054106
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 37183054106?
Census tract 37183054106 in the Neuse Ridge neighborhood scores 5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 37183054106?
Median gross rent is $1,492/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 37183054106?
9.9% of residents in tract 37183054106 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 9,076.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 37183054106?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 90th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 79th, household 80th, minority 86th, housing 92th.
Q5
Is tract 37183054106 considered part of Neuse Ridge?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 37183054106 fall within Neuse Ridge (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 37183054106?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 201 eviction filings across 2 validated years in tract 37183054106 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.00% of renter households, peaking at 9.5% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 37183054106 struggle to pay rent?
About 18.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 37183054106 compare to Raleigh overall?
Tract 37183054106 scores 5/10, higher than the parent city of Raleigh at 4.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Raleigh eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Raleigh
Top eight tracts in Raleigh ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · NC
Berkshire Downs
5.5
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · NC
Greenpark Towns
5.5
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · NC
Brentwood
5.5
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · NC
Hinton
5.5
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · NC
College View
5.5
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · NC
Bryson
5.5
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · NC
Heatherbrook
5.5
/ 10 · Elevated
Tract · NC
Fairview Hills
5.5
/ 10 · Elevated
Related