Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #16,850 of 84,120 nationally

Briggsdale Eviction Risk: Moderate , Columbus

Tract 39049008330 · Franklin County, OH · pop 1,552 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Eviction risk in the Briggsdale area of Columbus centers on tract 39049008330, which scores 6.1/10 (Elevated tier) and is home to 1,552 residents. On the national scale it ranks #19,382 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

67% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 32% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,097 a month against an average household income of $48,068 a year, roughly 27% of income at the averages. Renters make up 33% of occupied homes.

Risk score
5.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22% Stable renters 11% Owners 67%
Tract context
Occupied units697
Renter share32.7%
SVI overall0.74
Poverty rate30.5%
Median income$48,068

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Briggsdale
Very High
Within parent city
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#59 of 238 tracts In Columbus
High
Within county
84 th percentile
Rank, 84th percentileLowHigh
#53 of 328 tracts In Franklin County
High
Within state
89 th percentile
Rank, 89th percentileLowHigh
#365 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Columbus and the region

Centroid at 39.9368, -83.0447 · click any tract to drill in

Why Briggsdale scores 5.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Columbus
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
30.5% poverty · this tract
7.6
Supply constraint
$1,097 rent vs county FMR
2.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Columbus
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Columbus
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Columbus
4.0

How Briggsdale compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Briggsdale risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.65.6This tracttract 008330Columbus: 3.13.1Columbusparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 74

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 498Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 14.11%Avg annual filing rate
  • 23.5%Peak (2011)
  • 38Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390490083302002: 22 filings (11.06/100 renter HHs)2003: 29 filings (14.57/100 renter HHs)2004: 17 filings (8.54/100 renter HHs)2005: 34 filings (9.88/100 renter HHs)2006: 23 filings (6.69/100 renter HHs)2007: 40 filings (11.63/100 renter HHs)2008: 45 filings (13.08/100 renter HHs)2009: 48 filings (13.95/100 renter HHs)2010: 62 filings (27.56/100 renter HHs)2011: 63 filings (23.51/100 renter HHs)2012: 34 filings (12.69/100 renter HHs)2013: 43 filings (16.04/100 renter HHs)2015: 38 filings (14.18/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 73% over the past 13 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 253Total filings 2020-21
  • 3.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 3.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.10×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 4 filings (0.80× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2020-09-01: 17 filings (5.11× baseline)2020-10-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-12-01: 9 filings (4.50× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2021-02-01: 6 filings (1.20× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2021-04-01: 9 filings (1.93× baseline)2021-05-01: 9 filings (2.08× baseline)2021-06-01: 5 filings (1.25× baseline)2021-07-01: 8 filings (3.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 11 filings (4.12× baseline)2021-09-01: 3 filings (0.90× baseline)2021-10-01: 13 filings (6.50× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 8 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 4 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2022-03-01: 5 filings (1.36× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2022-05-01: 5 filings (1.15× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (0.75× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (1.12× baseline)2022-09-01: 7 filings (2.10× baseline)2022-10-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 9 filings (6.77× baseline)2022-12-01: 8 filings (4.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 2 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (0.82× baseline)2023-04-01: 2 filings (0.43× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (0.46× baseline)2023-06-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (0.37× baseline)2023-09-01: 3 filings (0.90× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 4 filings (3.01× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 5 filings (1.87× baseline)2024-02-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (0.43× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 3 filings (1.12× baseline)2024-08-01: 7 filings (2.62× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 4 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-02-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2025-04-01: 3 filings (0.64× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.25× baseline)2025-07-01: 2 filings (0.75× baseline)2025-08-01: 7 filings (2.62× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (0.30× baseline)2025-10-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-11-01: 5 filings (3.76× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Columbus, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Briggsdale. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Briggsdale

What moves this score most is economic stress at 7.6/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Columbus eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Franklin County average of 5.4 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 74th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 18.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 14.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 39049008330

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39049008330?

Census tract 39049008330 in the Briggsdale neighborhood scores 5.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39049008330?

Median gross rent is $1,097/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 67% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39049008330?

30.5% of residents in tract 39049008330 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,552.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39049008330?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 74th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 90th, household 43th, minority 20th, housing 71th.
Q5

Is tract 39049008330 considered part of Briggsdale?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39049008330 fall within Briggsdale (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39049008330?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 498 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 39049008330 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 14.11% of renter households, peaking at 23.5% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39049008330 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.10× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Columbus eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39049008330 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 14.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39049008330 compare to Columbus overall?

Tract 39049008330 scores 5.6/10, higher than the parent city of Columbus at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Columbus eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Columbus

Top eight tracts in Columbus ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related