Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #31,159 of 84,120 nationally

Briggsdale Eviction Risk: Moderate , Columbus

Tract 39049008340 · Franklin County, OH · pop 5,676 · neighborhood within 1.3 mi

Census tract 39049008340 sits in the Briggsdale neighborhood of Columbus eviction risk, Ohio eviction laws, and carries an eviction-risk score of 5.3/10. It lands near the 49th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

About 33% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 14% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,011 a month against an average household income of $73,026 a year, roughly 17% of income at the averages. About 53% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
4.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 35% Owners 48%
Tract context
Occupied units1,745
Renter share52.7%
SVI overall0.71
Poverty rate19.6%
Median income$73,026

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Briggsdale
Moderate
Within parent city
52 th percentile
Rank, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#115 of 238 tracts In Columbus
Moderate
Within county
65 th percentile
Rank, 65th percentileLowHigh
#117 of 328 tracts In Franklin County
Elevated
Within state
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#894 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Columbus and the region

Centroid at 39.9248, -83.0332 · click any tract to drill in

Why Briggsdale scores 4.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Columbus
6.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.6
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
19.6% poverty · this tract
4.9
Supply constraint
$1,011 rent vs county FMR
2.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Columbus
1.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Columbus
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Columbus
4.0

How Briggsdale compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Briggsdale risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.64.6This tracttract 008340Columbus: 3.13.1Columbusparent cityCounty: 3.93.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 71

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 635Total filings over 13 yrs
  • 5.73%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.2%Peak (2015)
  • 74Filings in 2015 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2015
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390490083402002: 28 filings (4.21/100 renter HHs)2003: 29 filings (4.36/100 renter HHs)2004: 24 filings (3.61/100 renter HHs)2005: 60 filings (5.99/100 renter HHs)2006: 49 filings (4.89/100 renter HHs)2007: 65 filings (6.49/100 renter HHs)2008: 61 filings (6.09/100 renter HHs)2009: 43 filings (4.29/100 renter HHs)2010: 49 filings (6.36/100 renter HHs)2011: 37 filings (4.59/100 renter HHs)2012: 51 filings (6.33/100 renter HHs)2013: 65 filings (8.06/100 renter HHs)2015: 74 filings (9.18/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 164% over the past 13 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 378Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.9Avg monthly (observed)
  • 4.9Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 12 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 15 filings (3.75× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2020-04-01: 1 filings (0.27× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.18× baseline)2020-06-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2020-07-01: 5 filings (1.15× baseline)2020-08-01: 5 filings (0.94× baseline)2020-09-01: 6 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-10-01: 3 filings (0.47× baseline)2020-11-01: 3 filings (0.69× baseline)2020-12-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 4 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2021-04-01: 3 filings (0.82× baseline)2021-05-01: 3 filings (0.53× baseline)2021-06-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 4 filings (0.92× baseline)2021-08-01: 6 filings (1.13× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2021-10-01: 2 filings (0.32× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (0.46× baseline)2021-12-01: 7 filings (1.40× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.17× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-03-01: 9 filings (1.69× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (0.82× baseline)2022-05-01: 2 filings (0.35× baseline)2022-06-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 2 filings (0.46× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (0.56× baseline)2022-09-01: 7 filings (0.78× baseline)2022-10-01: 6 filings (0.95× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-03-01: 3 filings (0.56× baseline)2023-04-01: 2 filings (0.54× baseline)2023-05-01: 10 filings (1.76× baseline)2023-06-01: 3 filings (0.75× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (0.46× baseline)2023-08-01: 11 filings (2.06× baseline)2023-09-01: 8 filings (0.89× baseline)2023-10-01: 5 filings (0.79× baseline)2023-11-01: 6 filings (1.39× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2024-01-01: 12 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 6 filings (1.13× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (0.82× baseline)2024-05-01: 4 filings (0.71× baseline)2024-06-01: 4 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (0.23× baseline)2024-08-01: 14 filings (2.63× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2024-10-01: 2 filings (0.32× baseline)2024-11-01: 7 filings (1.62× baseline)2024-12-01: 7 filings (1.40× baseline)2025-01-01: 10 filings (1.67× baseline)2025-02-01: 16 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 16 filings (3.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 3 filings (0.82× baseline)2025-05-01: 15 filings (2.65× baseline)2025-06-01: 6 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-07-01: 6 filings (1.39× baseline)2025-08-01: 20 filings (3.75× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-10-01: 7 filings (1.11× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (0.46× baseline)2025-12-01: 5 filings (1.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Columbus, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Briggsdale. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Briggsdale

The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 5.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Columbus eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Franklin County average of 5.4 and in line with the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 16.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 11.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 71st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39049008340

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39049008340?

Census tract 39049008340 in the Briggsdale neighborhood scores 4.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39049008340?

Median gross rent is $1,011/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39049008340?

19.6% of residents in tract 39049008340 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,676.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39049008340?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 71th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 61th, household 22th, minority 36th, housing 98th.
Q5

Is tract 39049008340 considered part of Briggsdale?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39049008340 fall within Briggsdale (neighborhood centroid within 1.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39049008340?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 635 eviction filings across 13 validated years in tract 39049008340 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.73% of renter households, peaking at 9.2% in 2015. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39049008340 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.00× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Columbus eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39049008340 struggle to pay rent?

About 16.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39049008340 compare to Columbus overall?

Tract 39049008340 scores 4.6/10, higher than the parent city of Columbus at 3.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Columbus eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Columbus

Top eight tracts in Columbus ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related