Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #11,930 of 84,120 nationally

Mount Auburn Historic District Eviction Risk: Elevated , Cincinnati

Tract 39061002200 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 1,992 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

The Mount Auburn Historic District area of Cincinnati anchors census tract 39061002200, which lands at 6.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. It lands near the 77th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 49% of renter households, a severe level, and 29% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $865 a month against an average household income of $22,042 a year, roughly 47% of income at the averages. Renters make up 77% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 38% Stable renters 39% Owners 23%
Tract context
Occupied units1,102
Renter share77.4%
SVI overall0.91
Poverty rate28.6%
Median income$22,042

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Mount Auburn Historic District
Moderate
Within parent city
84 th percentile
Rank, 84th percentileLowHigh
#19 of 110 tracts In Cincinnati
High
Within county
89 th percentile
Rank, 89th percentileLowHigh
#26 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
High
Within state
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#93 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cincinnati and the region

Centroid at 39.1221, -84.5048 · click any tract to drill in

Why Mount Auburn Historic District scores 6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cincinnati
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
28.6% poverty · this tract
7.1
Supply constraint
$865 rent vs county FMR
1.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cincinnati
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cincinnati
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cincinnati
4.5

How Mount Auburn Historic District compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Mount Auburn Historic District risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.06.0This tracttract 002200Cincinnati: 3.43.4Cincinnatiparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 91

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,572Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 15.28%Avg annual filing rate
  • 20.6%Peak (2010)
  • 61Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610022002002: 121 filings (15.11/100 renter HHs)2003: 130 filings (16.23/100 renter HHs)2004: 90 filings (11.24/100 renter HHs)2005: 107 filings (18.71/100 renter HHs)2006: 92 filings (16.08/100 renter HHs)2007: 135 filings (23.60/100 renter HHs)2008: 111 filings (19.41/100 renter HHs)2009: 115 filings (20.10/100 renter HHs)2010: 137 filings (20.60/100 renter HHs)2011: 111 filings (17.70/100 renter HHs)2012: 78 filings (12.44/100 renter HHs)2013: 79 filings (12.60/100 renter HHs)2014: 64 filings (10.21/100 renter HHs)2015: 66 filings (10.53/100 renter HHs)2016: 75 filings (11.00/100 renter HHs)2018: 61 filings (8.94/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 50% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 466Total filings 2020-21
  • 6.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 5.8Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.05×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 2 filings (0.36× baseline)2020-06-01: 7 filings (1.03× baseline)2020-07-01: 6 filings (0.83× baseline)2020-08-01: 3 filings (0.38× baseline)2020-09-01: 16 filings (2.22× baseline)2020-10-01: 9 filings (1.96× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (0.42× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2021-01-01: 2 filings (0.23× baseline)2021-02-01: 13 filings (2.83× baseline)2021-03-01: 6 filings (1.30× baseline)2021-04-01: 7 filings (1.03× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (0.36× baseline)2021-06-01: 12 filings (1.76× baseline)2021-07-01: 12 filings (1.67× baseline)2021-08-01: 3 filings (0.38× baseline)2021-09-01: 7 filings (0.97× baseline)2021-10-01: 9 filings (1.96× baseline)2021-11-01: 8 filings (1.67× baseline)2021-12-01: 7 filings (1.35× baseline)2022-01-01: 6 filings (0.70× baseline)2022-02-01: 7 filings (1.52× baseline)2022-03-01: 10 filings (2.17× baseline)2022-04-01: 12 filings (1.76× baseline)2022-05-01: 10 filings (1.79× baseline)2022-06-01: 9 filings (1.32× baseline)2022-07-01: 9 filings (1.25× baseline)2022-08-01: 13 filings (1.63× baseline)2022-09-01: 3 filings (0.42× baseline)2022-10-01: 16 filings (3.48× baseline)2022-11-01: 5 filings (1.04× baseline)2022-12-01: 8 filings (1.54× baseline)2023-01-01: 7 filings (0.81× baseline)2023-02-01: 11 filings (2.39× baseline)2023-03-01: 7 filings (1.52× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (0.44× baseline)2023-05-01: 10 filings (1.79× baseline)2023-06-01: 11 filings (1.62× baseline)2023-07-01: 2 filings (0.28× baseline)2023-08-01: 8 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 7 filings (0.97× baseline)2023-10-01: 5 filings (1.09× baseline)2023-11-01: 7 filings (1.46× baseline)2023-12-01: 7 filings (1.35× baseline)2024-01-01: 7 filings (0.81× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (0.65× baseline)2024-03-01: 5 filings (1.09× baseline)2024-04-01: 11 filings (1.62× baseline)2024-05-01: 10 filings (1.79× baseline)2024-06-01: 7 filings (1.03× baseline)2024-07-01: 10 filings (1.39× baseline)2024-08-01: 7 filings (0.88× baseline)2024-09-01: 5 filings (0.69× baseline)2024-10-01: 9 filings (1.96× baseline)2024-11-01: 3 filings (0.63× baseline)2024-12-01: 1 filings (0.19× baseline)2025-01-01: 8 filings (0.93× baseline)2025-02-01: 6 filings (1.30× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (0.65× baseline)2025-04-01: 5 filings (0.74× baseline)2025-05-01: 4 filings (0.71× baseline)2025-06-01: 8 filings (1.18× baseline)2025-07-01: 4 filings (0.56× baseline)2025-08-01: 2 filings (0.25× baseline)2025-09-01: 2 filings (0.28× baseline)2025-10-01: 7 filings (1.52× baseline)2025-11-01: 3 filings (0.63× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Mount Auburn Historic District

What moves this score most is economic stress at 7.1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cincinnati eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.05x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, roughly back to the pre-pandemic baseline.

The tract is Black and White and ranks around the 91st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061002200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061002200?

Census tract 39061002200 in the Mount Auburn Historic District neighborhood scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061002200?

Median gross rent is $865/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 49% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061002200?

28.6% of residents in tract 39061002200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,992.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061002200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 91th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 96th, household 77th, minority 79th, housing 69th.
Q5

Is tract 39061002200 considered part of Mount Auburn Historic District?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061002200 fall within Mount Auburn Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061002200?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,572 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061002200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 15.28% of renter households, peaking at 20.6% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39061002200 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.05× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39061002200 struggle to pay rent?

About 27.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 23.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39061002200 compare to Cincinnati overall?

Tract 39061002200 scores 6/10, higher than the parent city of Cincinnati at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cincinnati eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cincinnati

Top eight tracts in Cincinnati ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related