Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #31,159 of 84,120 nationally

Bond Hill Eviction Risk: Moderate , Cincinnati

Tract 39061006300 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 3,805 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

The Bond Hill area of Cincinnati anchors census tract 39061006300, which lands at 5.2/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 45% of US census tracts.

About 28% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a moderate level, and 14% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,002 monthly, set against $60,774 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 34% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
4.6
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 25% Owners 65%
Tract context
Occupied units1,503
Renter share34.1%
SVI overall0.73
Poverty rate16.0%
Median income$60,774

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Bond Hill
Moderate
Within parent city
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#64 of 110 tracts In Cincinnati
Moderate
Within county
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#76 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Elevated
Within state
72 th percentile
Rank, 72nd percentileLowHigh
#894 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cincinnati and the region

Centroid at 39.1772, -84.4625 · click any tract to drill in

Why Bond Hill scores 4.6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cincinnati
6.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
16.0% poverty · this tract
4.0
Supply constraint
$1,002 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cincinnati
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cincinnati
5.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cincinnati
4.5

How Bond Hill compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Bond Hill risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 4.64.6This tracttract 006300Cincinnati: 3.43.4Cincinnatiparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 73

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 1,831Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 11.76%Avg annual filing rate
  • 60.3%Peak (2002)
  • 62Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610063002002: 914 filings (60.29/100 renter HHs)2003: 41 filings (2.70/100 renter HHs)2004: 45 filings (2.97/100 renter HHs)2005: 64 filings (8.13/100 renter HHs)2006: 47 filings (5.97/100 renter HHs)2007: 64 filings (8.13/100 renter HHs)2008: 76 filings (9.66/100 renter HHs)2009: 73 filings (9.28/100 renter HHs)2010: 50 filings (7.51/100 renter HHs)2011: 68 filings (10.40/100 renter HHs)2012: 59 filings (9.02/100 renter HHs)2013: 55 filings (8.41/100 renter HHs)2014: 67 filings (10.24/100 renter HHs)2015: 60 filings (9.17/100 renter HHs)2016: 86 filings (15.30/100 renter HHs)2018: 62 filings (11.03/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 93% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 368Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.8Avg monthly (observed)
  • 5.1Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.95×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 1 filings (0.21× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (0.37× baseline)2020-07-01: 6 filings (0.67× baseline)2020-08-01: 4 filings (0.61× baseline)2020-09-01: 3 filings (0.42× baseline)2020-10-01: 5 filings (0.74× baseline)2020-11-01: 6 filings (1.15× baseline)2020-12-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 5 filings (1.14× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 4 filings (1.11× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (0.38× baseline)2021-05-01: 6 filings (1.25× baseline)2021-06-01: 8 filings (1.48× baseline)2021-07-01: 2 filings (0.22× baseline)2021-08-01: 4 filings (0.61× baseline)2021-09-01: 6 filings (0.83× baseline)2021-10-01: 7 filings (1.03× baseline)2021-11-01: 7 filings (1.35× baseline)2021-12-01: 7 filings (2.33× baseline)2022-01-01: 7 filings (1.59× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (0.56× baseline)2022-03-01: 5 filings (1.39× baseline)2022-04-01: 3 filings (0.58× baseline)2022-05-01: 8 filings (1.67× baseline)2022-06-01: 4 filings (0.74× baseline)2022-07-01: 7 filings (0.78× baseline)2022-08-01: 7 filings (1.06× baseline)2022-09-01: 5 filings (0.69× baseline)2022-10-01: 4 filings (0.59× baseline)2022-11-01: 7 filings (1.35× baseline)2022-12-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 7 filings (1.59× baseline)2023-02-01: 8 filings (2.22× baseline)2023-03-01: 2 filings (0.56× baseline)2023-04-01: 6 filings (1.15× baseline)2023-05-01: 8 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-06-01: 8 filings (1.48× baseline)2023-07-01: 5 filings (0.56× baseline)2023-08-01: 6 filings (0.91× baseline)2023-09-01: 8 filings (1.11× baseline)2023-10-01: 3 filings (0.44× baseline)2023-11-01: 4 filings (0.77× baseline)2023-12-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-01-01: 6 filings (1.36× baseline)2024-02-01: 2 filings (0.56× baseline)2024-03-01: 5 filings (1.39× baseline)2024-04-01: 7 filings (1.35× baseline)2024-05-01: 11 filings (2.29× baseline)2024-06-01: 3 filings (0.56× baseline)2024-07-01: 6 filings (0.67× baseline)2024-08-01: 4 filings (0.61× baseline)2024-09-01: 4 filings (0.56× baseline)2024-10-01: 5 filings (0.74× baseline)2024-11-01: 5 filings (0.96× baseline)2024-12-01: 9 filings (3.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 6 filings (1.36× baseline)2025-02-01: 5 filings (1.39× baseline)2025-03-01: 2 filings (0.56× baseline)2025-04-01: 7 filings (1.35× baseline)2025-05-01: 4 filings (0.83× baseline)2025-06-01: 3 filings (0.56× baseline)2025-07-01: 6 filings (0.67× baseline)2025-08-01: 7 filings (1.06× baseline)2025-09-01: 6 filings (0.83× baseline)2025-10-01: 4 filings (0.59× baseline)2025-11-01: 8 filings (1.54× baseline)2025-12-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2026-01-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Bond Hill. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Bond Hill

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 5.5/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cincinnati eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and in line with the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 73rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.

In CDC survey modeling, about 20.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 15.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061006300

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061006300?

Census tract 39061006300 in the Bond Hill neighborhood scores 4.6/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061006300?

Median gross rent is $1,002/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 28% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061006300?

16.0% of residents in tract 39061006300 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,805.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061006300?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 73th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 59th, household 66th, minority 96th, housing 70th.
Q5

Is tract 39061006300 considered part of Bond Hill?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061006300 fall within Bond Hill (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061006300?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,831 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061006300 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 11.76% of renter households, peaking at 60.3% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39061006300 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.95× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39061006300 struggle to pay rent?

About 20.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39061006300 compare to Cincinnati overall?

Tract 39061006300 scores 4.6/10, higher than the parent city of Cincinnati at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cincinnati eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Cincinnati

Top eight tracts in Cincinnati ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related