Census Tract · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Taylor Creek Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 39061020501 ·
Hamilton County, OH · pop 3,200 · 70% of tract blocks fall in Taylor Creek
With a score of 3/10, tract 39061020501 in Taylor Creek, OH reads lower for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,200 residents. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5%Stable renters 6%Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,256
Renter share11.6%
SVI overall0.02
Poverty rate3.8%
Median income$84,559
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Taylor Creek
Moderate
Within county
20th percentile
#182 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Very Low
Within state
31th percentile
#2,197 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Low
National
20th percentile
#67,219 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Taylor Creek and the region
Centroid at 39.2293, -84.6781 · click any tract to drill in
Why Taylor Creek scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Taylor Creek
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
3.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$856 rent vs county FMR
1.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Taylor Creek
4.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Taylor Creek
3.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Taylor Creek
3.3
How Taylor Creek compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 2
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
3%Socioeconomic
17%Household composition
24%Racial/ethnic minority
5%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
46Total filings over 14 yrs
2.64%Avg annual filing rate
3.8%Peak (2011)
4Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year2002 to 2018
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
25Total filings 2020-21
0.3Avg monthly (observed)
0.3Pre-pandemic baseline
1.16×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
8.2%Housing insecurity
5.8%Utility-shutoff threat
8.7%Food insecurity
6.5%SNAP enrollment
5.3%Transit barriers
5.6%No health insurance
16.0%Frequent mental distress
23.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Taylor Creek
On the high side, court filing pressure reads 8.3/10. On the softer side, supply constraint reads 1.7/10. It sits 1.4 points below the Hamilton County average of 4.4.
Food insecurity runs 8.7% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 6.5% against 15.2% nationally.
The filing record is not thin: 46 evictions over 14 years of observation. The worst year on record was 2011, when 3.8% of renter households were served.
In a typical year about 2.6% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Only 12% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Rent consumes only 12% of average household income of $84,559, an unusually wide affordability cushion. Statewide the OH average is 4.2, so this tract runs 1.2 points cooler.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 39061020501
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061020501?
Census tract 39061020501 in Taylor Creek scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39061020501?
Median gross rent is $856/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39061020501?
3.8% of residents in tract 39061020501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,200.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39061020501?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 2th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 17th, minority 24th, housing 5th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061020501?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 46 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 39061020501 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.64% of renter households, peaking at 3.8% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
Did eviction filings in tract 39061020501 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 1.16× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q7
What share of households in tract 39061020501 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 39061020501 compare to Taylor Creek overall?
Tract 39061020501 scores 3/10, right in line with the parent city of Taylor Creek at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Taylor Creek; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.