Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #71,178 of 84,120 nationally

Taylor Creek Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 39061020501 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 3,200 · 70% of tract blocks fall in Taylor Creek

In Taylor Creek, census tract 39061020501 scores 5.1/10 for eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #49,203 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

46% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $856 monthly, set against $84,559 in average yearly household income, roughly 12% of income at the averages. About 12% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 6% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units1,256
Renter share11.6%
SVI overall0.02
Poverty rate3.8%
Median income$84,559

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Taylor Creek
Moderate
Within county
19 th percentile
Rank, 19th percentileLowHigh
#184 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Very Low
Within state
19 th percentile
Rank, 19th percentileLowHigh
#2,573 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Very Low
National
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#71,178 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Taylor Creek and the region

Centroid at 39.2293, -84.6781 · click any tract to drill in

Why Taylor Creek scores 2.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Taylor Creek
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
3.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$856 rent vs county FMR
1.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Taylor Creek
4.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Taylor Creek
3.8
Housing court bias
Inherited from Taylor Creek
3.3

How Taylor Creek compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Taylor Creek risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.22.2This tracttract 020501Taylor Creek: 2.42.4Taylor Creekparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 2

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 46Total filings over 14 yrs
  • 2.64%Avg annual filing rate
  • 3.8%Peak (2011)
  • 4Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610205012002: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2003: 3 filings (2.97/100 renter HHs)2004: 3 filings (2.97/100 renter HHs)2005: 0 filings (0.00/100 renter HHs)2006: 4 filings (3.52/100 renter HHs)2007: 1 filings (0.88/100 renter HHs)2008: 3 filings (2.64/100 renter HHs)2009: 3 filings (2.64/100 renter HHs)2010: 1 filings (1.02/100 renter HHs)2011: 6 filings (3.82/100 renter HHs)2012: 6 filings (3.82/100 renter HHs)2013: 4 filings (2.55/100 renter HHs)2014: 1 filings (0.64/100 renter HHs)2015: 3 filings (1.91/100 renter HHs)2016: 4 filings (3.77/100 renter HHs)2018: 4 filings (3.77/100 renter HHs)

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 25Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.16×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 1 filings (5.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (5.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (5.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (10.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (5.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2022-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 2 filings (5.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 1 filings (5.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (5.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 3 filings (15.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 1 filings (5.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Taylor Creek

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 4.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Taylor Creek, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and in line with the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 5.8% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 2nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061020501

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061020501?

Census tract 39061020501 in Taylor Creek scores 2.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061020501?

Median gross rent is $856/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 46% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061020501?

3.8% of residents in tract 39061020501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,200.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061020501?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 2th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 3th, household 17th, minority 24th, housing 5th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061020501?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 46 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 39061020501 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.64% of renter households, peaking at 3.8% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 39061020501 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.16× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 39061020501 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 39061020501 compare to Taylor Creek overall?

Tract 39061020501 scores 2.2/10, right in line with the parent city of Taylor Creek at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Taylor Creek; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related