Census Tract · Ranked #71,178 of 84,120 nationally
Dry Ridge Eviction Risk: Lower
Tract 39061020502 ·
Hamilton County, OH · pop 5,621 · 41% of tract blocks fall in Dry Ridge
Census tract 39061020502 runs through Dry Ridge. With 5,621 residents, it scores 3.7/10 for landlords. That is riskier than about 7% of US census tracts.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 0% of renter households, a modest level, and 0% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $950 a month while the average household earns $96,417 a year, roughly 12% of income at the averages. About 8% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Risk score
2.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0%Stable renters 8%Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units2,035
Renter share7.7%
SVI overall0.11
Poverty rate7.8%
Median income$96,417
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Dry Ridge
Moderate
Within county
20th percentile
#182 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Very Low
Within state
19th percentile
#2,573 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Very Low
National
15th percentile
#71,178 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Dry Ridge and the region
Centroid at 39.2702, -84.6281 · click any tract to drill in
Why Dry Ridge scores 2.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dry Ridge
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
7.8% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$950 rent vs county FMR
2.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dry Ridge
1.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dry Ridge
3.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dry Ridge
2.3
How Dry Ridge compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 11
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
18%Socioeconomic
12%Household composition
38%Racial/ethnic minority
17%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
58Total filings over 16 yrs
3.68%Avg annual filing rate
9.6%Peak (2011)
6Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year2002 to 2018
Filings climbed 500% over the past 16 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
13Total filings 2020-21
0.2Avg monthly (observed)
0.2Pre-pandemic baseline
0.90×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
6.9%Housing insecurity
5.0%Utility-shutoff threat
7.8%Food insecurity
5.8%SNAP enrollment
4.8%Transit barriers
5.2%No health insurance
14.6%Frequent mental distress
25.0%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Dry Ridge
The heaviest input here is tenant organizing strength at 3.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Dry Ridge, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores well below the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and below the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.90x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 11th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.
For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.
Frequently asked
About tract 39061020502
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061020502?
Census tract 39061020502 in Dry Ridge scores 2.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39061020502?
Median gross rent is $950/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 0% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39061020502?
7.8% of residents in tract 39061020502 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,621.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39061020502?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 11th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 18th, household 12th, minority 38th, housing 17th.
Q5
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061020502?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 58 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061020502 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.68% of renter households, peaking at 9.6% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6
Did eviction filings in tract 39061020502 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.90× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q7
What share of households in tract 39061020502 struggle to pay rent?
About 6.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 39061020502 compare to Dry Ridge overall?
Tract 39061020502 scores 2.2/10, right in line with the parent city of Dry Ridge at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dry Ridge; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.