Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally

Dent Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 39061020601 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 6,542 · 70% of tract blocks fall in Dent

Census tract 39061020601 covers Dent in Hamilton County, home to 6,542 residents. For landlords it grades 5.6/10, a moderate reading. That is riskier than about 60% of US census tracts.

About 61% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 42% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,122 a month against an average household income of $109,458 a year, roughly 12% of income at the averages. Renters make up 16% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10% Stable renters 6% Owners 84%
Tract context
Occupied units2,443
Renter share15.8%
SVI overall0.15
Poverty rate7.4%
Median income$109,458

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Dent
Moderate
Within county
15 th percentile
Rank, 15th percentileLowHigh
#192 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Very Low
Within state
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#2,766 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Very Low
National
11 th percentile
Rank, 11th percentileLowHigh
#75,086 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Dent and the region

Centroid at 39.2083, -84.6519 · click any tract to drill in

Why Dent scores 1.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Dent
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
7.4% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$1,122 rent vs county FMR
3.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Dent
5.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Dent
4.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Dent
4.8

How Dent compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Dent risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.91.9This tracttract 020601Dent: 2.62.6Dentparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 15

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 347Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 5.60%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.4%Peak (2005)
  • 14Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610206012002: 13 filings (3.90/100 renter HHs)2003: 18 filings (5.41/100 renter HHs)2004: 20 filings (6.01/100 renter HHs)2005: 36 filings (8.43/100 renter HHs)2006: 16 filings (3.75/100 renter HHs)2007: 17 filings (3.98/100 renter HHs)2008: 33 filings (7.73/100 renter HHs)2009: 25 filings (5.85/100 renter HHs)2010: 29 filings (7.00/100 renter HHs)2011: 26 filings (7.54/100 renter HHs)2012: 29 filings (8.41/100 renter HHs)2013: 24 filings (6.96/100 renter HHs)2014: 11 filings (3.19/100 renter HHs)2015: 17 filings (4.93/100 renter HHs)2016: 19 filings (3.79/100 renter HHs)2018: 14 filings (2.79/100 renter HHs)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 75Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.0Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.62×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 2 filings (1.67× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (0.63× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.71× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.63× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (2.50× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (0.71× baseline)2022-08-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (1.67× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.63× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 2 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2023-07-01: 3 filings (2.14× baseline)2023-08-01: 5 filings (4.17× baseline)2023-09-01: 2 filings (0.83× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (1.88× baseline)2024-03-01: 1 filings (0.63× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (0.91× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 3 filings (2.50× baseline)2024-09-01: 3 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (1.25× baseline)2025-05-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2025-07-01: 6 filings (4.29× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (1.67× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (0.83× baseline)2025-12-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Dent

What moves this score most is rent-control risk at 5.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Dent, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 347 eviction filings here over 16 tracked years, with about 5.6% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 8.4% of renter households in 2005.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 15th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061020601

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061020601?

Census tract 39061020601 in Dent scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061020601?

Median gross rent is $1,122/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 61% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061020601?

7.4% of residents in tract 39061020601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,542.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061020601?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 15th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 15th, household 47th, minority 4th, housing 19th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061020601?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 347 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061020601 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 5.60% of renter households, peaking at 8.4% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 39061020601 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.62× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 39061020601 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 5.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 39061020601 compare to Dent overall?

Tract 39061020601 scores 1.9/10, lower than the parent city of Dent at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Dent; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Dent

Top eight tracts in Dent ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related