Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally

Pleasant Hills Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 39061022101 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 4,262 · 16% of tract blocks fall in Pleasant Hills

With a score of 5.2/10, tract 39061022101 in Pleasant Hills ranks in the Moderate tier for landlord eviction risk. The tract is home to 4,262 residents. On the national scale it ranks #46,229 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 57% of renter households, a severe level, and 42% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,639 a month against an average household income of $105,250 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 8% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 5% Stable renters 4% Owners 91%
Tract context
Occupied units1,817
Renter share8.2%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate5.8%
Median income$105,250

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Pleasant Hills
Moderate
Within county
14 th percentile
Rank, 14th percentileLowHigh
#195 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Very Low
Within state
13 th percentile
Rank, 13th percentileLowHigh
#2,766 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Very Low
National
11 th percentile
Rank, 11th percentileLowHigh
#75,086 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Pleasant Hills and the region

Centroid at 39.2429, -84.5070 · click any tract to drill in

Why Pleasant Hills scores 1.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Pleasant Hills
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
5.8% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$1,639 rent vs county FMR
7.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pleasant Hills
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pleasant Hills
2.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pleasant Hills
2.3

How Pleasant Hills compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Pleasant Hills risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.91.9This tracttract 022101Pleasant Hills: 2.62.6Pleasant Hillsparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 24

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 284Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 11.02%Avg annual filing rate
  • 16.9%Peak (2007)
  • 21Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610221012002: 14 filings (12.61/100 renter HHs)2003: 16 filings (14.41/100 renter HHs)2004: 14 filings (12.61/100 renter HHs)2005: 11 filings (5.82/100 renter HHs)2006: 20 filings (10.58/100 renter HHs)2007: 32 filings (16.93/100 renter HHs)2008: 23 filings (12.17/100 renter HHs)2009: 8 filings (4.23/100 renter HHs)2010: 11 filings (7.86/100 renter HHs)2011: 7 filings (4.43/100 renter HHs)2012: 18 filings (11.39/100 renter HHs)2013: 22 filings (13.92/100 renter HHs)2014: 26 filings (16.46/100 renter HHs)2015: 17 filings (10.76/100 renter HHs)2016: 24 filings (11.82/100 renter HHs)2018: 21 filings (10.34/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 50% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 91Total filings 2020-21
  • 1.2Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.72×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (0.77× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (1.67× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (0.38× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2022-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.71× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2022-11-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 3 filings (2.14× baseline)2023-05-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (0.91× baseline)2023-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 2 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-01-01: 5 filings (2.27× baseline)2024-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (2.50× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.71× baseline)2024-05-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 3 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 2 filings (0.83× baseline)2024-09-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2024-11-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 4 filings (3.33× baseline)2025-01-01: 3 filings (1.36× baseline)2025-02-01: 5 filings (12.50× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (1.43× baseline)2025-05-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.56× baseline)2025-07-01: 4 filings (1.54× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (0.42× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-12-01: 4 filings (3.33× baseline)2026-01-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Pleasant Hills

What moves this score most is supply constraint at 7.7/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Pleasant Hills, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and in line with the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 24th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 8.8% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061022101

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061022101?

Census tract 39061022101 in Pleasant Hills scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061022101?

Median gross rent is $1,639/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061022101?

5.8% of residents in tract 39061022101 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,262.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061022101?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 19th, household 84th, minority 58th, housing 6th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061022101?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 284 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061022101 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 11.02% of renter households, peaking at 16.9% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 39061022101 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.72× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 39061022101 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 39061022101 compare to Pleasant Hills overall?

Tract 39061022101 scores 1.9/10, lower than the parent city of Pleasant Hills at 2.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pleasant Hills; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related