Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #81,634 of 84,120 nationally

Fox Hunter Lane Eviction Risk: Lower , Montgomery

Tract 39061024322 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 8,905 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

For landlords sizing up Fox Hunter Lane in Montgomery, census tract 39061024322 carries a moderate eviction-risk score of 4.9/10. That is riskier than about 34% of US census tracts.

32% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 20% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,690 monthly, set against $180,202 in average yearly household income, roughly 11% of income at the averages. Renters make up 19% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 6% Stable renters 13% Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units2,927
Renter share18.9%
SVI overall0.05
Poverty rate3.6%
Median income$180,202

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Fox Hunter Lane
Moderate
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Montgomery
Very Low
Within county
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#220 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Very Low
Within state
3 th percentile
Rank, 3rd percentileLowHigh
#3,067 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Montgomery and the region

Centroid at 39.2477, -84.3133 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fox Hunter Lane scores 1.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Montgomery
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
3.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,690 rent vs county FMR
8.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Montgomery
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Montgomery
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Montgomery
3.3

How Fox Hunter Lane compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fox Hunter Lane risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.21.2This tracttract 024322Montgomery: 2.42.4Montgomeryparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 5

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 297Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 4.27%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.2%Peak (2010)
  • 8Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610243222002: 18 filings (3.96/100 renter HHs)2003: 11 filings (2.42/100 renter HHs)2004: 14 filings (3.08/100 renter HHs)2005: 22 filings (5.97/100 renter HHs)2006: 16 filings (4.34/100 renter HHs)2007: 10 filings (2.71/100 renter HHs)2008: 28 filings (7.60/100 renter HHs)2009: 24 filings (6.51/100 renter HHs)2010: 34 filings (7.20/100 renter HHs)2011: 28 filings (5.76/100 renter HHs)2012: 34 filings (7.00/100 renter HHs)2013: 23 filings (4.73/100 renter HHs)2014: 14 filings (2.88/100 renter HHs)2015: 5 filings (1.03/100 renter HHs)2016: 8 filings (1.53/100 renter HHs)2018: 8 filings (1.53/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 56% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 56Total filings 2020-21
  • 0.7Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.3Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.57×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 2 filings (2.50× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (1.67× baseline)2021-04-01: 1 filings (0.63× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 1 filings (5.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2022-06-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 3 filings (7.50× baseline)2022-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 1 filings (0.83× baseline)2023-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-07-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2023-08-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 2 filings (5.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-02-01: 3 filings (0.94× baseline)2024-03-01: 2 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-04-01: 1 filings (0.63× baseline)2024-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2024-07-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2024-08-01: 1 filings (0.45× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (5.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2024-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (1.25× baseline)2025-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 1 filings (0.63× baseline)2025-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 1 filings (5.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 1 filings (2.50× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 2 filings (2.50× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fox Hunter Lane

What moves this score most is supply constraint at 8.1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Montgomery, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and in line with the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.57x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, well below the pre-pandemic norm, the signature of an eviction moratorium at work.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 5th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061024322

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061024322?

Census tract 39061024322 in the Fox Hunter Lane neighborhood scores 1.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061024322?

Median gross rent is $1,690/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 32% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061024322?

3.6% of residents in tract 39061024322 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 8,905.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061024322?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 5th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 23th, minority 34th, housing 12th.
Q5

Is tract 39061024322 considered part of Fox Hunter Lane?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061024322 fall within Fox Hunter Lane (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061024322?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 297 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061024322 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.27% of renter households, peaking at 7.2% in 2010. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39061024322 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.57× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings dropped sharply, likely a moratorium effect. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39061024322 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39061024322 compare to Montgomery overall?

Tract 39061024322 scores 1.2/10, lower than the parent city of Montgomery at 2.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Montgomery; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Montgomery

Top eight tracts in Montgomery ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related