Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #23,554 of 84,120 nationally

Carthage Eviction Risk: Moderate , Cincinnati

Tract 39061025700 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 2,312 · neighborhood within 0.9 mi

Census tract 39061025700 runs through the Carthage neighborhood of Cincinnati. With 2,312 residents, it scores 6.7/10 for landlords. That is riskier than about 90% of US census tracts.

54% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 24% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $663 a month while the average household earns $39,980 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 59% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 32% Stable renters 27% Owners 41%
Tract context
Occupied units763
Renter share58.8%
SVI overall0.82
Poverty rate23.9%
Median income$39,980

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Carthage
Very High
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Cincinnati
Moderate
Within county
76 th percentile
Rank, 76th percentileLowHigh
#56 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
High
Within state
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#622 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cincinnati and the region

Centroid at 39.1855, -84.4892 · click any tract to drill in

Why Carthage scores 5.1

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cincinnati
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
23.9% poverty · this tract
6.0
Supply constraint
$663 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cincinnati
9.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cincinnati
9.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cincinnati
8.8

How Carthage compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Carthage risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.15.1This tracttract 025700Cincinnati: 3.43.4Cincinnatiparent cityCounty: 3.83.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 82

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 980Total filings over 16 yrs
  • 12.94%Avg annual filing rate
  • 18.1%Peak (2011)
  • 65Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2018
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 390610257002002: 46 filings (8.06/100 renter HHs)2003: 66 filings (11.56/100 renter HHs)2004: 56 filings (9.81/100 renter HHs)2005: 47 filings (10.35/100 renter HHs)2006: 60 filings (13.22/100 renter HHs)2007: 58 filings (12.78/100 renter HHs)2008: 53 filings (11.67/100 renter HHs)2009: 50 filings (11.01/100 renter HHs)2010: 50 filings (9.60/100 renter HHs)2011: 77 filings (18.12/100 renter HHs)2012: 71 filings (16.71/100 renter HHs)2013: 76 filings (17.88/100 renter HHs)2014: 72 filings (16.94/100 renter HHs)2015: 65 filings (15.29/100 renter HHs)2016: 68 filings (12.30/100 renter HHs)2018: 65 filings (11.75/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 41% over the past 16 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 316Total filings 2020-21
  • 4.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 5.6Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.73×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 4 filings (0.71× baseline)2020-06-01: 4 filings (0.71× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 1 filings (0.13× baseline)2020-09-01: 5 filings (0.56× baseline)2020-10-01: 4 filings (0.53× baseline)2020-11-01: 5 filings (0.81× baseline)2020-12-01: 4 filings (0.61× baseline)2021-01-01: 2 filings (0.56× baseline)2021-02-01: 2 filings (0.40× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (0.45× baseline)2021-04-01: 5 filings (1.19× baseline)2021-05-01: 4 filings (0.71× baseline)2021-06-01: 5 filings (0.89× baseline)2021-07-01: 5 filings (0.76× baseline)2021-08-01: 5 filings (0.64× baseline)2021-09-01: 3 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-10-01: 4 filings (0.53× baseline)2021-11-01: 4 filings (0.65× baseline)2021-12-01: 5 filings (0.76× baseline)2022-01-01: 2 filings (0.56× baseline)2022-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (0.45× baseline)2022-04-01: 5 filings (1.19× baseline)2022-05-01: 4 filings (0.71× baseline)2022-06-01: 8 filings (1.43× baseline)2022-07-01: 4 filings (0.61× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (0.38× baseline)2022-09-01: 7 filings (0.78× baseline)2022-10-01: 2 filings (0.26× baseline)2022-11-01: 7 filings (1.13× baseline)2022-12-01: 4 filings (0.61× baseline)2023-01-01: 6 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.20× baseline)2023-03-01: 6 filings (1.36× baseline)2023-04-01: 4 filings (0.95× baseline)2023-05-01: 2 filings (0.36× baseline)2023-06-01: 5 filings (0.89× baseline)2023-07-01: 7 filings (1.06× baseline)2023-08-01: 3 filings (0.38× baseline)2023-09-01: 5 filings (0.56× baseline)2023-10-01: 5 filings (0.66× baseline)2023-11-01: 6 filings (0.97× baseline)2023-12-01: 4 filings (0.61× baseline)2024-01-01: 10 filings (2.78× baseline)2024-02-01: 7 filings (1.40× baseline)2024-03-01: 6 filings (1.36× baseline)2024-04-01: 8 filings (1.90× baseline)2024-05-01: 2 filings (0.36× baseline)2024-06-01: 6 filings (1.07× baseline)2024-07-01: 12 filings (1.82× baseline)2024-08-01: 7 filings (0.90× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.11× baseline)2024-10-01: 4 filings (0.53× baseline)2024-11-01: 5 filings (0.81× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (0.30× baseline)2025-01-01: 6 filings (1.67× baseline)2025-02-01: 3 filings (0.60× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (0.68× baseline)2025-04-01: 2 filings (0.48× baseline)2025-05-01: 5 filings (0.89× baseline)2025-06-01: 6 filings (1.07× baseline)2025-07-01: 3 filings (0.45× baseline)2025-08-01: 5 filings (0.64× baseline)2025-09-01: 3 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-10-01: 7 filings (0.92× baseline)2025-11-01: 9 filings (1.45× baseline)2025-12-01: 8 filings (1.21× baseline)2026-01-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Carthage. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Carthage

What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 9.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cincinnati eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Hamilton County average of 5.6 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 980 eviction filings here over 16 tracked years, with about 12.9% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 18.1% of renter households in 2011.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 0.73x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, a little under the pre-pandemic norm.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 39061025700

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061025700?

Census tract 39061025700 in the Carthage neighborhood scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39061025700?

Median gross rent is $663/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39061025700?

23.9% of residents in tract 39061025700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,312.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39061025700?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 82th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 94th, minority 22th, housing 47th.
Q5

Is tract 39061025700 considered part of Carthage?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061025700 fall within Carthage (neighborhood centroid within 0.9 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061025700?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 980 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061025700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 12.94% of renter households, peaking at 18.1% in 2011. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

Did eviction filings in tract 39061025700 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 0.73× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8

What share of households in tract 39061025700 struggle to pay rent?

About 25.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 21.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9

How does tract 39061025700 compare to Cincinnati overall?

Tract 39061025700 scores 5.1/10, higher than the parent city of Cincinnati at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cincinnati eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related