Neighborhood · Ranked #31,049 of 84,120 nationally
Village Historic District Eviction Risk: Moderate , Cincinnati
Tract 39061027400 ·
Hamilton County, OH · pop 4,514 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi
39061027400 is a census tract in the Village Historic District area of Lockland, OH. It scores 5.1/10 for landlords. Against Hamilton County at 42.5%, 26% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
5.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 11%Stable renters 31%Owners 58%
Tract context
Occupied units1,969
Renter share41.4%
SVI overall0.83
Poverty rate16.7%
Median income$48,683
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
60th percentile
#3 of 6 tracts In Village Historic District
Elevated
Within parent city
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Cincinnati
Moderate
Within county
63th percentile
#85 of 226 tracts In Hamilton County
Elevated
Within state
72th percentile
#881 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cincinnati and the region
Centroid at 39.2255, -84.4563 · click any tract to drill in
Why Village Historic District scores 5.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Cincinnati
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
16.7% poverty · this tract
4.2
Supply constraint
$743 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cincinnati
3.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cincinnati
8.1
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cincinnati
5.4
How Village Historic District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 83
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
77%Socioeconomic
93%Household composition
55%Racial/ethnic minority
67%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
1,716Total filings over 16 yrs
10.73%Avg annual filing rate
11.3%Peak (2004)
96Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings by year2002 to 2018
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 16 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
742Total filings 2020-21
9.6Avg monthly (observed)
8.9Pre-pandemic baseline
1.08×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–20212020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Village Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
19.8%Housing insecurity
15.3%Utility-shutoff threat
25.3%Food insecurity
24.2%SNAP enrollment
13.0%Transit barriers
11.4%No health insurance
21.2%Frequent mental distress
34.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Village Historic District
The clearest offset is supply constraint at 1/10. Severe burden reaches 20%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Sitting well above the midpoint, court filing pressure reads 8.3/10.
On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.1/10. At $743 a month, rents run 21% under what the rest of Lockland commands. SNAP participation runs 24.2% against 15.2% nationally.
Court records carry 1,716 eviction filings across 16 observed years. Food insecurity runs 25.3% against 17.8% nationally. It sits 0.7 points above the Hamilton County average of 4.4.
The worst year on record was 2004, when 11.3% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 10.7% of renter households face a filing.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 39061027400
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061027400?
Census tract 39061027400 in the Village Historic District neighborhood scores 5.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39061027400?
Median gross rent is $743/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 26% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39061027400?
16.7% of residents in tract 39061027400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,514.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39061027400?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 83th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 77th, household 93th, minority 55th, housing 67th.
Q5
Is tract 39061027400 considered part of Village Historic District?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061027400 fall within Village Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061027400?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,716 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061027400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 10.73% of renter households, peaking at 11.3% in 2004. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 39061027400 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 1.08× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8
What share of households in tract 39061027400 struggle to pay rent?
About 19.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 15.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9
How does tract 39061027400 compare to Cincinnati overall?
Tract 39061027400 scores 5.1/10, higher than the parent city of Cincinnati at 4.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cincinnati eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.