Within neighborhood
20
th percentile
Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Village Historic District Eviction Risk: Lower , Cincinnati
Tract 39061022601 · Hamilton County, OH · pop 6,165 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
Tract 39061022601 sits in the Village Historic District area of Wyoming eviction laws, OH, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. It is home to 6,165 residents. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 93%
Tract context
Occupied units2,031
Renter share6.8%
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate0.5%
Median income$181,875
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
100
th percentile
Very High
Within county
9
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
31
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cincinnati and the region
Centroid at 39.2307, -84.4859 · click any tract to drill in
Why Village Historic District scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Cincinnati
6.2
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.8
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
0.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,650 rent vs county FMR
7.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cincinnati
1.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cincinnati
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cincinnati
1.9
How Village Historic District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 3
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 0%Socioeconomic
- 9%Household composition
- 28%Racial/ethnic minority
- 24%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 58Total filings over 16 yrs
- 2.96%Avg annual filing rate
- 10.3%Peak (2012)
- 3Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 57% over the past 16 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 44Total filings 2020-21
- 0.6Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.2Pre-pandemic baseline
- 2.82×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Cincinnati, OH as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Village Historic District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.0%Housing insecurity
- 3.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 4.8%Food insecurity
- 3.2%SNAP enrollment
- 3.4%Transit barriers
- 3.5%No health insurance
- 12.4%Frequent mental distress
- 18.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Village Historic District
At $1,650 a month, rents run 32% over what the rest of Wyoming commands. The voucher gap is 28.2%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
Running hot, court filing pressure reads 8.3/10. On the softer side, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.8/10. Against the Hamilton County average of 4.4, this tract reads safer for landlords by 1.4 points.
The filing record is not thin: 58 evictions over 16 years of observation. Adults with no health insurance runs 3.5% against 11.3% nationally.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.7% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Filings peaked in 2012 at 10.3% of renter households. In a typical year about 3.0% of renter households face a filing.
Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Only 7% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.3/10.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 39061022601
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39061022601?
Census tract 39061022601 in the Village Historic District neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39061022601?
Median gross rent is $1,650/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 0% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39061022601?
0.5% of residents in tract 39061022601 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,165.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39061022601?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 0th, household 9th, minority 28th, housing 24th.
Q5
Is tract 39061022601 considered part of Village Historic District?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39061022601 fall within Village Historic District (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39061022601?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 58 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 39061022601 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.96% of renter households, peaking at 10.3% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 39061022601 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 2.82× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Cincinnati eviction risk, OH), 2020-2021.
Q8
What share of households in tract 39061022601 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q9
How does tract 39061022601 compare to Cincinnati overall?
Tract 39061022601 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Cincinnati at 4.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cincinnati eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Cincinnati
Top eight tracts in Cincinnati ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related
Explore the geography around tract 39061022601
Parent city ↑
Cincinnati
4.5 / 10
Parent county ↑
Hamilton County
Parent state ↑
Ohio
Sibling tract →
Village Historic District
3 / 10
Sibling tract →
Village Historic District
4.9 / 10
Sibling tract →
Village Historic District
5.1 / 10
Methodology
How the score is built
Interactive map
Explore all 84k tracts