Within neighborhood
20
th percentile
Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #29,578 of 84,120 nationally
Fruitland Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Painesville
Tract 39085204000 · Lake County, OH · pop 3,100 · neighborhood within 1.5 mi
In Fruitland Park in Painesville, census tract 39085204000 scores 5.4/10 for eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #40,102 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
39% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 26% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $846 a month against an average household income of $56,184 a year, roughly 18% of income at the averages. Renters make up 41% of occupied homes.
Risk score
4.7
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 16%
Stable renters 25%
Owners 59%
Tract context
Occupied units1,554
Renter share41.4%
SVI overall0.47
Poverty rate21.9%
Median income$56,184
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
93
th percentile
Very High
Within state
74
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Painesville and the region
Centroid at 41.7476, -81.2728 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fruitland Park scores 4.7
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Painesville
4.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.3
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
21.9% poverty · this tract
5.5
Supply constraint
$846 rent vs county FMR
2.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Painesville
4.9
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Painesville
8.3
Housing court bias
Inherited from Painesville
6.5
How Fruitland Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 47
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 70%Socioeconomic
- 32%Household composition
- 31%Racial/ethnic minority
- 31%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 495Total filings over 14 yrs
- 6.75%Avg annual filing rate
- 13.6%Peak (2013)
- 17Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 48% over the past 14 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Fruitland Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.8%Housing insecurity
- 8.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 13.9%Food insecurity
- 12.2%SNAP enrollment
- 7.6%Transit barriers
- 7.8%No health insurance
- 18.0%Frequent mental distress
- 32.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fruitland Park
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 8.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Painesville, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Lake County average of 4.8 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 495 eviction filings here over 14 tracked years, with about 6.7% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 13.6% of renter households in 2013.
The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 47th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 39085204000
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39085204000?
Census tract 39085204000 in the Fruitland Park neighborhood scores 4.7/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39085204000?
Median gross rent is $846/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 39% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39085204000?
21.9% of residents in tract 39085204000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,100.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39085204000?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 47th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 70th, household 32th, minority 31th, housing 31th.
Q5
Is tract 39085204000 considered part of Fruitland Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39085204000 fall within Fruitland Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39085204000?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 495 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 39085204000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.75% of renter households, peaking at 13.6% in 2013. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 39085204000 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 39085204000 compare to Painesville overall?
Tract 39085204000 scores 4.7/10, higher than the parent city of Painesville at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Painesville; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Related