Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #19,618 of 84,120 nationally

Fruitland Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Painesville

Tract 39085204200 · Lake County, OH · pop 4,411 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi

Census tract 39085204200 covers part of the Fruitland Park area of Painesville, OH, and scores 5.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. Population here is 4,411. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.2/10.

Risk score
5.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22% Stable renters 33% Owners 45%
Tract context
Occupied units1,579
Renter share54.3%
SVI overall0.89
Poverty rate23.2%
Median income$47,163

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 6 tracts In Fruitland Park
Very High
Within parent city
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 5 tracts In Painesville
Moderate
Within county
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 59 tracts In Lake County
Very High
Within state
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#190 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Painesville and the region

Centroid at 41.7395, -81.2502 · click any tract to drill in

Why Fruitland Park scores 5.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Painesville
4.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.3
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
23.2% poverty · this tract
5.8
Supply constraint
$977 rent vs county FMR
3.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Painesville
7.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Painesville
9.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Painesville
7.7

How Fruitland Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Fruitland Park risk score vs. parent city / county / state5.9This tracttract 2042004.5Painesvilleparent city3.8Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 89

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 545Total filings over 14 yrs
  • 6.14%Avg annual filing rate
  • 8.9%Peak (2008)
  • 35Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2002 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 39085204200
Filings climbed 84% over the past 14 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Fruitland Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Fruitland Park

27% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Against the Lake County average of 3.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.1 points. Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.9/10.

The poverty rate is 23%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. Running hot, housing-court posture reads 7.7/10. Adults with no health insurance runs 21.5% against 11.3% nationally.

Inability to pay a utility bill runs 18.9% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. The filing record is not thin: 545 evictions over 14 years of observation. The worst year on record was 2008, when 8.9% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 6.1% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 77% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Social vulnerability reads 9.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 39085204200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39085204200?

Census tract 39085204200 in the Fruitland Park neighborhood scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39085204200?

Median gross rent is $977/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 40% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39085204200?

23.2% of residents in tract 39085204200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,411.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39085204200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 89th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 75th, household 96th, minority 73th, housing 82th.
Q5

Is tract 39085204200 considered part of Fruitland Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39085204200 fall within Fruitland Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39085204200?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 545 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 39085204200 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.14% of renter households, peaking at 8.9% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 39085204200 struggle to pay rent?

About 25.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 18.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 39085204200 compare to Painesville overall?

Tract 39085204200 scores 5.9/10, higher than the parent city of Painesville at 4.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Painesville; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Painesville

Top eight tracts in Painesville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related