Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #45,786 of 84,120 nationally
East Village Eviction Risk: Moderate , Cuyahoga Falls
Tract 39153520104 · Summit County, OH · pop 3,777 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi
Tract 39153520104 sits in the East Village area of Cuyahoga Falls eviction risk, OH, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.2/10. Population here is 3,777. 28% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
4.2
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21%
Stable renters 29%
Owners 50%
Tract context
Occupied units1,967
Renter share50.1%
SVI overall0.62
Poverty rate9.0%
Median income$57,660
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
75
th percentile
High
Within county
53
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
57
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cuyahoga Falls and the region
Centroid at 41.1335, -81.4723 · click any tract to drill in
Why East Village scores 4.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
9.0% poverty · this tract
2.2
Supply constraint
$1,048 rent vs county FMR
4.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
4.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
7.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
4.7
How East Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 62
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 67%Socioeconomic
- 59%Household composition
- 21%Racial/ethnic minority
- 62%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 33%Grade B
- 55%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 790Total filings over 17 yrs
- 4.59%Avg annual filing rate
- 8.6%Peak (2006)
- 47Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 29% over the past 17 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 11.5%Housing insecurity
- 8.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 14.3%Food insecurity
- 11.6%SNAP enrollment
- 8.0%Transit barriers
- 8.0%No health insurance
- 19.1%Frequent mental distress
- 30.3%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in East Village
Pulling hardest the other way is eviction-process difficulty at 2.1/10. On the softer side, economic stress reads 2.2/10. Running cool, state political climate reads 2.4/10.
The filing record is not thin: 790 evictions over 17 years of observation. The worst year on record was 2006, when 8.6% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 4.6% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #45,786 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.6/10.
42% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. It tracks the Summit County average of 4.1 closely. Average gross rent is $1,048, close to the Cuyahoga Falls average.
Annual rent works out to 22% of average household income of $57,660.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 39153520104
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39153520104?
Census tract 39153520104 in the East Village neighborhood scores 4.2/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39153520104?
Median gross rent is $1,048/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39153520104?
9.0% of residents in tract 39153520104 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,777.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39153520104?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 62th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 67th, household 59th, minority 21th, housing 62th.
Q5
Is tract 39153520104 considered part of East Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39153520104 fall within East Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39153520104?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 790 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 39153520104 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.59% of renter households, peaking at 8.6% in 2006. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 39153520104 struggle to pay rent?
About 11.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 8.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 39153520104 compare to Cuyahoga Falls overall?
Tract 39153520104 scores 4.2/10, right in line with the parent city of Cuyahoga Falls at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cuyahoga Falls eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 39153520104 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Cuyahoga Falls
Top eight tracts in Cuyahoga Falls ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · OH
West Village
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
Underwood
5.2
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
Weatherstone
4.2
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
North Village
4.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
North Village
4.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
Berkshire Park Historic District
3.8
/ 10 · Low
Tract · OH
Hampton Bluff
3.8
/ 10 · Low
Tract · OH
Cross Creek
3.5
/ 10 · Low
Related