Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
North Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Cuyahoga Falls
Tract 39153530700 · Summit County, OH · pop 2,621 · neighborhood within 0.6 mi
39153530700 is a census tract in the North Village area of Silver Lake, OH. It scores 3/10 for landlords. It is home to 2,621 residents. Against Summit County at 41.2%, 9% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 1%
Stable renters 7%
Owners 92%
Tract context
Occupied units966
Renter share7.9%
SVI overall0.02
Poverty rate2.6%
Median income$142,083
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
10
th percentile
Very Low
Within state
31
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cuyahoga Falls and the region
Centroid at 41.1529, -81.4652 · click any tract to drill in
Why North Village scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
2.6% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,696 rent vs county FMR
10.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
1.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
2.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
1.8
How North Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 2
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 4%Socioeconomic
- 12%Household composition
- 15%Racial/ethnic minority
- 6%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 36%Grade A
- 11%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 32Total filings over 14 yrs
- 4.84%Avg annual filing rate
- 21.4%Peak (2017)
- 1Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within North Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 5.1%Housing insecurity
- 3.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 5.5%Food insecurity
- 3.6%SNAP enrollment
- 3.6%Transit barriers
- 3.9%No health insurance
- 12.9%Frequent mental distress
- 23.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in North Village
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 10/10. The voucher gap is 50.0%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. Running cool, economic stress reads 1/10.
Well under the midpoint, rent-regulation exposure reads 1.3/10. Food insecurity runs 5.5% against 17.8% nationally.
SNAP participation runs 3.6% against 15.2% nationally. It sits 1.1 points below the Summit County average of 4.1.
Court records carry 32 eviction filings across 14 observed years. The worst year on record was 2017, when 21.4% of renter households were served.
This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Akron. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 4.8% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Only 8% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.2/10.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 39153530700
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39153530700?
Census tract 39153530700 in the North Village neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39153530700?
Median gross rent is $1,696/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 9% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39153530700?
2.6% of residents in tract 39153530700 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,621.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39153530700?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 2th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 4th, household 12th, minority 15th, housing 6th.
Q5
Is tract 39153530700 considered part of North Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39153530700 fall within North Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.6 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39153530700?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 32 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 39153530700 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.84% of renter households, peaking at 21.4% in 2017. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 39153530700 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 39153530700 compare to Cuyahoga Falls overall?
Tract 39153530700 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Cuyahoga Falls at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cuyahoga Falls eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 39153530700 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of A. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Related