Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #58,384 of 84,120 nationally
North Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Cuyahoga Falls
Tract 39153520105 · Summit County, OH · pop 4,314 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
How risky is North Village in Cuyahoga Falls for landlords? Census tract 39153520105 scores 4.8/10, the Moderate tier. That is riskier than roughly 31% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 27% of renter households, a moderate level, and 12% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $870 monthly, set against $67,035 in average yearly household income, roughly 16% of income at the averages. Renters make up 37% of occupied homes.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10%
Stable renters 27%
Owners 63%
Tract context
Occupied units1,876
Renter share37.4%
SVI overall0.58
Poverty rate10.3%
Median income$67,035
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
83
th percentile
High
Within county
47
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
39
th percentile
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cuyahoga Falls and the region
Centroid at 41.1417, -81.4620 · click any tract to drill in
Why North Village scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
10.3% poverty · this tract
2.6
Supply constraint
$870 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
4.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
7.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
4.7
How North Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 58
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 38%Socioeconomic
- 54%Household composition
- 35%Racial/ethnic minority
- 85%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 15%Grade B
- 17%Grade C
- 7%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 1,177Total filings over 17 yrs
- 8.23%Avg annual filing rate
- 9.7%Peak (2005)
- 24Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 68% over the past 17 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within North Village. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 10.5%Housing insecurity
- 7.4%Utility-shutoff threat
- 12.9%Food insecurity
- 10.3%SNAP enrollment
- 7.1%Transit barriers
- 7.6%No health insurance
- 18.0%Frequent mental distress
- 30.2%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in North Village
What moves this score most is tenant organizing strength at 7.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Cuyahoga Falls eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Summit County average of 5.2 and in line with the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.
Part of this tract, about 7% of its area, sat in the redlined grade-D zone on 1930s HOLC maps, though its dominant grade was C ("Declining"). That lending history still correlates with present-day rent burden.
Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 1,177 eviction filings here over 17 tracked years, with about 8.2% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 9.7% of renter households in 2005.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
Frequently asked
About tract 39153520105
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39153520105?
Census tract 39153520105 in the North Village neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39153520105?
Median gross rent is $870/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 27% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39153520105?
10.3% of residents in tract 39153520105 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,314.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39153520105?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 58th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 38th, household 54th, minority 35th, housing 85th.
Q5
Is tract 39153520105 considered part of North Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39153520105 fall within North Village (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39153520105?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,177 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 39153520105 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 8.23% of renter households, peaking at 9.7% in 2005. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 39153520105 struggle to pay rent?
About 10.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 39153520105 compare to Cuyahoga Falls overall?
Tract 39153520105 scores 3/10, higher than the parent city of Cuyahoga Falls at 2.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cuyahoga Falls eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 39153520105 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 7% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Cuyahoga Falls
Top eight tracts in Cuyahoga Falls ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · OH
Underwood
3.8
/ 10 · Low
Tract · OH
West Village
3.8
/ 10 · Low
Tract · OH
North Village
3
/ 10 · Low
Tract · OH
East Village
3
/ 10 · Low
Tract · OH
Weatherstone
3
/ 10 · Low
Tract · OH
Berkshire Park Historic District
2.8
/ 10 · Low
Tract · OH
Hampton Bluff
2.8
/ 10 · Low
Tract · OH
Berkshire Park Historic District
2.6
/ 10 · Low
Related