Within neighborhood
50
th percentile
Moderate
Neighborhood · Ranked #52,479 of 84,120 nationally
Hampton Bluff Eviction Risk: Lower , Cuyahoga Falls
Tract 39153532902 · Summit County, OH · pop 9,534 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
Census tract 39153532902 covers part of the Hampton Bluff area of Cuyahoga Falls, OH, and scores 3.8/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 9,534 residents. Severe burden reaches 28%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 20%
Stable renters 19%
Owners 61%
Tract context
Occupied units4,098
Renter share39.0%
SVI overall0.63
Poverty rate12.9%
Median income$87,647
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
47
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
48
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Cuyahoga Falls and the region
Centroid at 41.1771, -81.5110 · click any tract to drill in
Why Hampton Bluff scores 3.8
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.5
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
12.9% poverty · this tract
3.2
Supply constraint
$1,047 rent vs county FMR
4.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
4.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
7.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Cuyahoga Falls
4.7
How Hampton Bluff compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 63
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 42%Socioeconomic
- 68%Household composition
- 39%Racial/ethnic minority
- 82%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 1,379Total filings over 17 yrs
- 10.77%Avg annual filing rate
- 26.8%Peak (2007)
- 77Filings in 2018 (latest validated)
Filings stayed roughly flat over the past 17 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.1%Housing insecurity
- 6.0%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.8%Food insecurity
- 7.5%SNAP enrollment
- 5.8%Transit barriers
- 5.7%No health insurance
- 15.3%Frequent mental distress
- 28.6%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Hampton Bluff
The clearest offset is eviction-process difficulty at 2.1/10. Cost burden runs 50% here against 41.2% across Summit County.
Running cool, state political climate reads 2.4/10. Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 7.6/10.
Court records carry 1,379 eviction filings across 17 observed years. Food insecurity runs 9.8% against 17.8% nationally.
SNAP participation runs 7.5% against 15.2% nationally. The worst year on record was 2007, when 26.8% of renter households were served.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 10.8% of renter households face a filing.
That is riskier than roughly 38% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6.6/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Against average income of $87,647, annual rent is just 14%. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 39153532902
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39153532902?
Census tract 39153532902 in the Hampton Bluff neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39153532902?
Median gross rent is $1,047/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39153532902?
12.9% of residents in tract 39153532902 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 9,534.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39153532902?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 63th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 42th, household 68th, minority 39th, housing 82th.
Q5
Is tract 39153532902 considered part of Hampton Bluff?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39153532902 fall within Hampton Bluff (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39153532902?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 1,379 eviction filings across 17 validated years in tract 39153532902 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 10.77% of renter households, peaking at 26.8% in 2007. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 39153532902 struggle to pay rent?
About 8.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.0% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 39153532902 compare to Cuyahoga Falls overall?
Tract 39153532902 scores 3.8/10, right in line with the parent city of Cuyahoga Falls at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Cuyahoga Falls eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 39153532902 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Cuyahoga Falls
Top eight tracts in Cuyahoga Falls ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · OH
West Village
5.3
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
Underwood
5.2
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
East Village
4.2
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
Weatherstone
4.2
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
North Village
4.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
North Village
4.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · OH
Berkshire Park Historic District
3.8
/ 10 · Low
Tract · OH
Cross Creek
3.5
/ 10 · Low
Related