Carlisle Eviction Risk: Lower

The main counterweight is economic stress at 1.2/10. Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 2/10. The voucher gap is 22.1%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.

Running cool, state political climate reads 2.4/10. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 38 filings here across 8 tracked years. Filings peaked in 2011 at 6.8% of renter households.

In a typical year about 3.8% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #52,479 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

At 12% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 32% of renters.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.