Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #52,479 of 84,120 nationally

Turner Park Eviction Risk: Lower , Tulsa

Tract 40143001900 · Tulsa County, OK · pop 1,575 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi

40143001900 is a census tract in the Turner Park area of Tulsa, OK. It scores 3.8/10 for landlords. 28% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Risk score
3.8
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 17% Stable renters 25% Owners 58%
Tract context
Occupied units783
Renter share42.1%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate15.8%
Median income$63,516

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 2 tracts In Turner Park
Very Low
Within parent city
42 th percentile
Rank, 42nd percentileLowHigh
#82 of 140 tracts In Tulsa
Moderate
Within county
59 th percentile
Rank, 59th percentileLowHigh
#85 of 208 tracts In Tulsa County
Elevated
Within state
58 th percentile
Rank, 58th percentileLowHigh
#513 of 1,205 tracts In Oklahoma
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tulsa and the region

Centroid at 36.1543, -95.9359 · click any tract to drill in

Why Turner Park scores 3.8

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Tulsa
4.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.2
State political climate
Oklahoma legislature & governorship
1.5
Economic stress
15.8% poverty · this tract
4.0
Supply constraint
$1,198 rent vs county FMR
5.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Tulsa
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Tulsa
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Tulsa
2.5

How Turner Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Turner Park risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.83.8This tracttract 001900Tulsa: 3.43.4Tulsaparent cityCounty: 3.73.7Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 39

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: B: Still Desirable

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade B meant middle-class areas with mortgage access. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Turner Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Turner Park

Pulling hardest the other way is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Well under the midpoint, state political climate reads 1.5/10.

On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.5/10. At $1,198 a month, rents run 14% over what the rest of Tulsa commands. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground B ("Still Desirable"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

On the national scale it lands near the 38th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 4.5/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

41% of renter households spend at least 30% of income on rent. It tracks the Tulsa County average of 3.7 closely. Annual rent works out to 23% of average household income of $63,516.

42% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 40143001900

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 40143001900?

Census tract 40143001900 in the Turner Park neighborhood scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 40143001900?

Median gross rent is $1,198/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 40143001900?

15.8% of residents in tract 40143001900 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,575.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 40143001900?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 68th, household 43th, minority 52th, housing 9th.
Q5

Is tract 40143001900 considered part of Turner Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 40143001900 fall within Turner Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 40143001900 struggle to pay rent?

About 13.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 10.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 40143001900 compare to Tulsa overall?

Tract 40143001900 scores 3.8/10, higher than the parent city of Tulsa at 3.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Tulsa eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 40143001900 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of B. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Tulsa

Top eight tracts in Tulsa ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related