Forest Ridge Eviction Risk: Lower , Tulsa

The voucher gap is 46.7%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. What pushes it up most is supply constraint at 9.7/10.

Severe burden reaches 28%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10. Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1/10.

Food insecurity runs 6.3% against 17.8% nationally. Housing insecurity runs 6.0% against 14.2% nationally.

Against the Tulsa County average of 3.7, this tract reads safer for landlords by 0.7 points. This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Tulsa. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above.

Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty. Social vulnerability reads 2.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.