Darlington South Eviction Risk: Lower , Tulsa

The dominant input is supply constraint at 9.8/10. The voucher gap is 47.6%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. 54% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well above the Tulsa County average of 40.3%.

Running cool, rent-regulation exposure reads 1/10. 23% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

Well under the midpoint, economic stress reads 1.3/10. Food insecurity runs 8.4% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 5.8% against 15.2% nationally.

It sits 0.7 points below the Tulsa County average of 3.7. On the national scale it lands near the 20th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Only 14% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.

Social vulnerability reads 3.1/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Rent consumes only 17% of average household income of $121,328, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.